Dis 2 reply

Question

Discussion Prompts for Follow-Up Peer Responses: In replying to peers, please review their initial posts and thoroughly discuss what else should be considered for PBP’s successful AI adoption based on your review of their identified trends, recommendation, and implementing action. In your discussion, please do not repeat the content of your initial post. Instead, please use external sources and/or course content to help ensure that the identified peer plan does not fail. Caleb- External trends: Having conducted a thorough PESTLE analysis, I have determined that the two trends that could impact Powered by People(PBP) are, Political and Technological. Political: PBP faces significant potential political challenges in adopting AI due to the rapidly evolving landscape of AI legislation in the United States. States like New York, Colorado, and Illinois have implemented or are considering laws that impose strict requirements on AI usage in HR (Seth Merrill, 2025). These regulations often mandate transparency, bias audits, and employee notifications when AI tools are utilized. The state regulations present a compliance challenge for PBP, which operates globally. The inconsistency in AI laws can lead to increased risks if PBP fails to adhere to state requirements. As there is no federal AI legislation, PBP may be delayed in their AI integration efforts when it inevitably is written. Technology: AI is rapidly transforming the nature of work across nearly all industries. Continually evolving, AI tools and resources are also reshaping the way human resources (HR) professionals hire, train, evaluate, develop and support employees in today’s changing labor market. HR professionals expect AI to play an even more prevalent role in their work lives in the coming years (BOFA, 2025). For PBP, embracing AI technology can lead to improved efficiency, and a more data-driven approach to talent acquisition and management. However as mentioned in the Political assessment, PBP will need to remain cautious with its implementation, despite the positive potential effects. Recommendation: Based upon the PESTLE analysis, PBP should carefully implement an AI adoption program while rigorously following the pre-existing AI legislation, and allowing flexibility for future AI legislation. Strategic Implementation:A key component of PBP’s successful AI adoption will be a well-developed AI oversight program. To guide implementation, PBP will use a SWOT analysis, a strategic tool in the form of a matrix with four key categories: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (Skotnicka-Zasadzień et al., 2023).

Use PBP expertise to develop an AI oversight program. Slowly implement AI in compliance with legislation. Provide staff with AI tools, increasing efficiency. Monitor results of AI implementation, and external legislation of AI Seth Merrill (2025, Sep 9) How AI legislation in the US impacts HR teams https://www.sixfifty.com/blog/how-ai-legislation-in-the-us-impacts-hr-teams BOFA (2025, Apr) Human resources and AI in the workplace https://business.bofa.com/content/dam/flagship/workplace-benefits/ai-for-hr/ai-for-human-resources.pdf Skotnicka-Zasadzień, B., Zasadzień, M., & Grebski, W. (2023). Application of Tows/Swot Analysis as an Element of Strategic Management on the Example of a Manufacturing Company. https://managementpapers.polsl.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/189-Skotnicka-Zasadzie%C5%84-Zasadzie%C5%84-Grebski.pdf Second student- Carlyn To support Powered by People (PBP) in the strategic integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), it is essential to consider key external factors using the PESTEL framework. Below are two critical trends—Technological and Legal—that have a direct influence on AI adoption in the global staffing and recruitment industry. 1. Technological Trend – Rapid Evolution of AI and Machine Learning in Recruitment The staffing and recruitment industry is undergoing a major technological shift, driven by AI-powered tools such as resume screening algorithms, chatbots for candidate engagement, and predictive analytics for job matching. According to a 2021 report by LinkedIn, over 67% of recruiters report increased efficiency through AI-driven tools, especially in screening and sourcing candidates (LinkedIn Talent Solutions, 2021). Opportunity: For PBP, this presents a significant opportunityto enhance recruitment speed, accuracy, and scalability. AI can streamline the hiring process by automating repetitive tasks like resume screening and initial candidate outreach. This will not only reduce time-to-hire but also allow recruiters to focus more on strategic activities such as building client relationships and ensuring cultural fit. However, PBP should carefully select or develop AI tools aligned with their commitment to diverse and compliant hiring, especially in global markets with varied norms and expectations. 2. Legal Trend – Data Privacy Regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA) AI systems that handle recruitment data must comply with stringent global privacy regulations. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)in the EU and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the U.S. place strict limits on how companies collect, process, and store personal data. Threat: Non-compliance with data privacy laws can result in heavy fines and reputational damage. AI algorithms also risk introducing bias if not carefully monitored, which could violate anti-discrimination laws in hiring practices (West & Allen, 2018). This legal trend is a threat that PBP must strategically mitigate, especially since their operations span multiple legal jurisdictions. To remain compliant, PBP must ensure AI tools are transparent, auditable, and explainable, with clear consent processes and data handling policies. AI Adoption Recommendation Based on the analysis above, I recommend that PBP adopt a phased AI implementation strategythat starts with augmenting—rather than replacing—human recruiters. This allows PBP to: Gradually integrate AI into core processes such as candidate sourcing and screeningMaintain human oversight to ensure fairness, inclusivity, and complianceCollect real-time feedback and performance metrics to refine AI usage A hybrid approach allows PBP to capitalize on AI's efficiency gains while maintaining the human-centric, expert-driven service that defines their brand. Strategic Implementation Action A key action step to implement this recommendation is to create an internal AI Ethics and Compliance Task Force. This cross-functional team should include experts from HR, legal, IT, and data governance. The Task Force will be responsible for: Vetting and selecting AI vendors or technologiesDeveloping policies for responsible AI use (aligned with GDPR and similar frameworks)Monitoring outcomes for bias, fairness, and transparencyTraining staff on the use of AI tools and ethical implications Establishing this task force ensures that PBP’s AI adoption is strategically aligned with its missionof delivering diverse and compliant global staffing solutions. Conclusion PBP is in a strong position to leverage AI as a strategic growth enabler in the recruitment industry. By recognizing the technological opportunities and legal threats through PESTEL analysis, adopting a measured, human-augmented AI strategy, and implementing ethical oversight, PBP can enhance performance while safeguarding its core values and legal standing. References LinkedIn Talent Solutions. (2021). The Future of Recruiting: 2021 Report. https://business.linkedin.com West, S. M., & Allen, J. R. (2018). How to regulate artificial intelligence. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://gdpr.eu California Legislative Information. (2020). California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov 0 Unread0Unread 0 Replies0Replies 5 Views5Views

expertsolution · Answer

please find the attachment. read this well and develop your knowledge and understanding and then use it for your excellent grades. leave a healthy feedback as this is my real reward for completing this answer as a tutorial.response to caleb
  
there are elements within your pestle analysis wherein you present the political and technological hurdles pbp faces in acquiring ai. i would recommend that they not only look at setting up an oversight program but also at the ethical alignment risks and workforce adaptability. workers in hr freely resist the takeover of ai-invoked hr processes, fearing job displacement or mistrust in the algorithmic decision-making process. hence, without some structured change management to prepare the employees in place alongside their implementation plans, an ai policy-adoption agenda remains at risk of failing. studies have shown that in settings where ai was applied successfully, these organizations would invest in upskilling and reskill their people along with transparent communication about how ai would support and not replace hr roles (bughin et al., 2018). in pbp's case, training programs on ai literacy and ethical hiring will probably dampen resistance among employees and raise their trust.   
while your comments belong to u.s. state legislation, pbp's international operations require a compliance mechanism beyond the jurisdictional borders. ai frameworks are now being developed by countries in the eu, asia, and latin america, often imposing a stricter set of rules than the u.s. applying a fragmented compliance process would lead to inefficiencies. instead, the pbp could adopt a compliance-by-design framework which ensures ethical and legal safeguards in ai systems from the start to make global law easy to adapt (jobin et al. 2019). your swot analysis advice is definitely powerful; i would supplement it with continuous auditing mechanisms for evaluating algorithmic fairness, transparency, and data integrity. these audits should also be placed under external evaluations besides internal audit mechanisms to show the stakeholders' accountability. so much for overseeing change management, compliance by design, and external auditing, with this, pbp will minimize both the political and technical risks in it, but will also put that confident step toward making ai a part of its global image as a trustworthy recruitment partner.

references
 bughin, j., hazan, e., lund, s., dahlström, p., wiesinger, a., & subramaniam, a. (2018). skill shift: automation and the future of the workforce. mckinsey global institute. https://www.mckinsey.com
 jobin, a., ienca, m., & vayena, e. (2019). the global landscape of ai ethics guidelines. nature machine intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

response to carlyn
  
this report talks a little about use cases or implications that have legal implications resulting possibly from the use of ai. put a little more strongly, carlyn, your emphasis on these technological trends and legal trends and developments is extremely salient, especially given the international scope of pbp. and, following your lead, i think that one thing pbp should consider focusing on in a phased ai strategy is candidate experience and confidence. sure, ai might save time in the screening and engagement processes, but candidates might judge algorithmic decisions as impersonal-sounding or even biased. it has been shown in the study that job applicants would prefer when ai are introduced at various stages in the hiring process would prefer transparency, and personalized face-to-face interaction (tambe et al., 2019). therefore pbp has to be a candidate-near the definition of what, when, and how ai is being used while also ensuring that human involvement by the recruiter in the decision stage is kept intact-by definition opens the door to a candidate-focused.
  
you also emphasize compliance with the gdpr and the ccpa, which is great. beyond compliance, however, pbp should hold data ethics as a competitive differentiator. these can include ethical precepts on fairness, accountability, and explainability of the use of ai, and such principles would help pbp stand out in the crowded and growing field of recruitment. in a competitive world business environment, studies such as floridi and cowls 2019 show that organizations operating with transparency in their ai practices build a strong brand reputation and client loyalty. i would certainly recommend external advisory partnerships with legal specialists in the field as well as data scientists outside of pbp competitions. these enable an unbiased perspective on compliance and the mitigation of bias and will also keep the company at the forefront of evolving best practices. in this way, by external stakeholder engagement and ethical consideration for candidates, pbp may manage compliance and enhance long-term sustainability for ai adoption. these additions have great potential to augment the existing framework that has been well laid out and go a long way toward protecting brand integrity and enabling global competitiveness.

references
 floridi, l., & cowls, j. (2019). a unified framework of five principles for ai in society. harvard data science review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
 tambe, p., cappelli, p., & yakubovich, v. (2019). artificial intelligence in human resources management: challenges and a path forward. california management review, 61(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910

EliteEduSolver · Answer

responding to caleb's post: caleb's post rightly highlights the crucial political and technological trends affecting ai adoption for pbp, emphasizing compliance with evolving legislation and the potential for increased efficiency. while his recommendation for careful implementation with an oversight program is sound, here are additional considerations to strengthen pbp's approach and prevent potential pitfalls: 1. beyond compliance: proactive ethical ai frameworks:caleb mentions the need to "rigorously following pre-existing ai legislation" and "allowing flexibility for future ai legislation." while crucial, pbp should go beyond mere compliance and proactively develop its own comprehensive ethical ai framework. legislation often lags technological advancements. a proactive framework ensures pbp isn't just reacting to laws but shaping its ai use based on its values and commitment to fairness. this framework should explicitly address:* bias mitigation strategies: how will pbp identify and actively mitigate algorithmic bias in areas like resume screening or candidate matching? this requires more than just auditing; it involves diverse data sets, regular fairness checks, and potentially explainable ai (xai) techniques to understand decision-making. as outlined by ibm, "responsible ai includes capabilities like explainability, fairness, robustness, transparency, privacy, and governance." (ibm, n.d.).* data governance and privacy by design: while carlyn mentions gdpr and ccpa, caleb's post could benefit from further emphasis on integrating privacy principles into the design of ai systems from the outset, not just as an afterthought. this ensures that data minimisation, purpose limitation, and individual rights are embedded into the ai lifecycle.* accountability mechanisms: who is ultimately responsible when an ai system makes a flawed or biased decision? pbp's oversight program should clearly define roles, responsibilities, and escalation paths for ai-related issues. 2. stakeholder engagement and change management:caleb's strategic implementation focuses on internal expertise and monitoring. however, successful ai adoption heavily relies on buy-in and effective change management across the organization.* employee training and upskilling: beyond providing ai tools, pbp needs to invest heavily in training employees on how to use these tools effectively, ethically, and to understand their limitations. fear of job displacement can be a significant barrier. communicating the "human-in-the-loop" approach (as carlyn suggests) and demonstrating how ai augments roles can alleviate concerns.* user-centric design: involving the end-users (recruiters, hr professionals) in the design and testing phases of ai tools can ensure they are practical, intuitive, and address real pain points, leading to higher adoption rates and better outcomes.* transparency with candidates: if pbp uses ai in candidate-facing processes, transparency about its use is crucial for maintaining trust and brand reputation, especially in light of evolving disclosure requirements in some jurisdictions. 3. measuring roi and continuous improvement:caleb suggests monitoring results, which is excellent. to make this robust, pbp should establish clear, quantifiable key performance indicators (kpis) beyond just efficiency. these might include:* reduction in time-to-hire for specific roles.* improvement in candidate quality or retention rates.* diversity metrics to ensure ai isn't inadvertently narrowing talent pools.* cost savings from automation. >strong class="ng-star-inserted">reference:ibm. (n.d.). responsible ai. retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/watson/responsible-airies, e. (2011). >span class="ng-star-inserted">. crown business. responding to carlyn's post: carlyn's post effectively highlights the technological opportunities and legal threats, particularly around data privacy (gdpr, ccpa), and provides a strong recommendation for a phased, human-augmented ai strategy with an ai ethics and compliance task force. building on her excellent foundation, here are further considerations: 1. data quality and infrastructure:carlyn mentions ai's reliance on recruitment data and the need for compliance. however, the quality and availability of this data are paramount for ai success.* data cleanliness and integration: ai systems are only as good as the data they are fed. pbp needs to ensure its existing recruitment data is clean, consistent, and integrated across various systems. fragmented or poor-quality data can lead to inaccurate ai predictions and biased outcomes, undermining the very efficiency gains pbp seeks. "garbage in, garbage out" is particularly true for ai (davenport & kirby, 2016).* data annotation and labelling: for many advanced ai applications (e.g., natural language processing for resume analysis), data may need to be carefully annotated and labeled. this is often a labor-intensive but critical step.* scalable infrastructure: as pbp integrates more ai, its it infrastructure must be capable of handling increased data processing and storage requirements, potentially involving cloud computing solutions to ensure scalability and cost-effectiveness. 2. vendor management and due diligence for ai tools:carlyn's suggestion of an ai ethics and compliance task force vetting vendors is excellent. this vetting process should be extremely rigorous.* transparency and explainability from vendors: pbp should demand transparency from ai vendors about how their algorithms work, how bias is mitigated, and what data sources are used. this includes pushing for explainable ai (xai) capabilities where possible, allowing pbp to understand why an ai made a particular recommendation (e.g., why a candidate was ranked higher).* security posture of vendors: beyond data privacy regulations, pbp needs to assess the cybersecurity measures of ai vendors to protect sensitive candidate and employee data from breaches.* service level agreements (slas): clear slas should be in place with vendors regarding performance, uptime, support, and responsibilities for addressing issues, especially if pbp becomes highly reliant on these tools. 3. intellectual property and competitive advantage:carlyn identifies the opportunity for enhanced recruitment speed and accuracy. to maintain a competitive edge, pbp should consider:* proprietary ai development vs. off-the-shelf solutions: while starting with commercial tools is often practical, pbp should evaluate if developing specialized, proprietary ai components (e.g., custom algorithms tailored to specific industry niches or unique candidate assessment methodologies) could create a stronger, defensible competitive advantage in the long run.* protecting ai-generated insights: as ai generates valuable insights (e.g., predictive models for talent shortages, optimal sourcing channels), pbp needs a strategy to protect this intellectual property and leverage it strategically. 4. the "human-in-the-loop" operationalization:carlyn's recommendation of a human-augmented approach is key. pbp needs to clearly define how the "human-in-the-loop" will function.* defining human-ai collaboration: this isn't just about having a human review ai output. it involves designing workflows where humans and ai play complementary roles, leveraging each other's strengths. for example, ai identifies top candidates, and humans conduct deeper qualitative assessments and build relationships.* feedback loops: how will human recruiters provide feedback to improve the ai's performance? this feedback loop is essential for continuous learning and refinement of the ai models. reference:davenport, t. h., & kirby, j. (2016). only humans need apply: winners and losers in the age of smart machines. harperbusiness. by considering these additional points, pbp can develop an even more robust and resilient ai adoption strategy, mitigating risks and maximizing the potential benefits.

Category:	Economics
Offered Price:	$4.00
Due Date:	27 September 2025, 20:09
Added:	26 September 2025, 09:52

Price:	4.99
Added:	26 September 2025, 14:25
Words:	815 words
Attachments:	1 file, 818 words
Buyers:	1 buyer
Rating:

Price:	4.00
Added:	27 September 2025, 12:48
Words:	1076 words
Buyers:	No Buyers Yet

Dis 2 reply

Discussion Prompts for Follow-Up Peer Responses:

1. Technological Trend – Rapid Evolution of AI and Machine Learning in Recruitment

2. Legal Trend – Data Privacy Regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA)

AI Adoption Recommendation

Strategic Implementation Action

Conclusion

References

Secure Payment

We let the professionals process your money

Secure Payment

We let the professionals process your money

Have a similar question?