Chapter 34: pp. 399-408
This chapter presents undoubtedly the heaviest material in the textbook. Perhaps though by looking at the darkest events in the 20th century, we might learn from the way writers and artists coped with the tragedy of war? How do their poems, stories, films, and paintings reflect on political forces such as fascism and totalitarianism? Can we find wisdom and even flickers of hope in these works? What price did these artists and writers pay as a result of the act of creation, especially if they were deemed enemies of the state? To what degree do they perpetuate or revolt against the conflicts?
Active Vocabulary
gallows humor
Dadaism
tone (in works of art and literature)
photomontage
Weimar
Read pages 399-408.
I. Pay close attention to Owen’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” and the excerpt from Remarque’sAll Quiet on the Western Front (translated from the German).
Listen to a dramatic reading of Owen’s poem. You might recognize the reader.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qB4cdRgIcB8
What biographical information does the text give you about Owen? There were a number of British soldiers in WWI who wrote famously and candidly about their experiences in war. One of the best resources is the First World War Poetry Digital Archive:http://ww1lit.nsms.ox.ac.uk/ww1lit/
The archive has audio, film, collections. Here is a link to Owen’s biography:http://ww1lit.nsms.ox.ac.uk/ww1lit/collections/owen
Here is a link to the last letter Owen wrote to his mother, from ‘The Smoky Cellar of the Forester’s House.’http://ww1lit.nsms.ox.ac.uk/ww1lit/collections/document/5262
What does the letter reveal to you about the man Owen, himself? About his abilities as a writer?
If you want insight other than you own into why Owen’s poem is considered one of the most important of the 20th century in the English language, here is a video of a British scholar examining the document:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp4QMI9hKdk
II. Read the translated excerpt from Remarque’sAll Quiet on the Western Front.
Many consider this perhaps the finest war novel of the 20th century. What biographical details does your text give you on this writer? Where was he from? Did he survive the war? If so, how? How did the Nazi regime respond to this book?
Here’s a representative picture, to give you an idea. What is burning in the foreground? Can you guess?
If you have a strong stomach and are so inclined, read Remarque’s book in English (even better, in German). Here’s a link to the audiobook (in English translation) if you prefer:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSrhR4EXido
You could also find the film and watch it. Here is a scene calledThe Butterfly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMlDPsRwZE4
III. Shifting from dark humor, or as your book terms it,gallows humor,read 405-406, and look closely at Figure 34.3: George Grosz’sFit for Active Service. Grosz, too, was a veteran of the German army. He was (loosely, perhaps) a Dadaist. He mischievously sent Dadaist care packages of satirically useless stuff, like ironed white shirts, to soldiers on the front. Was he mocking the soldiers? If not, who or what was he mocking? Do you remember the Dadaists from chapter 33? Dadaism: the anti-art movement. Here’s what Grosz himself had to say about it:
"In those days we were all Dadaists. If the word meant anything at all, it meant seething discontent, dissatisfaction and cynicism. Defeat and political ferment always give rise to that sort of movement.
We held Dadaist meetings, charged a few marks admission and did nothing but tell people the truth, that is, abuse them. The news spread quickly and soon our meetings were sold out, crammed with people wanting to be scandalized or just after fun.
Between insults we performed 'art,' but the performances were as a rule interrupted. Thus hardly would Walter Mehring begin to rattle away at his typewriter while reciting some piece or other of his own composition, when Heartfield or Hausmann would come out from behind the stage and yell: 'Stop! You're not trying to bamboozle that feeble-minded lot down there, are you?' "
--George Grosz, The Autobiography of George Grosz [1955]
Here is a link to an article, with a few video clips, about Dada, if you need a refresher:http://www.openculture.com/2014/08/the-abcs-of-dada.html
Now that we have some context, back to Grosz’s political cartoon on p. 406. Can you read it? In other words, can you comprehend the text and the visual cues? Who are the people around the perimeter of the room? Why is the doctor in the center of the room examining a skeleton? Why does he sayKV (short forkriegsverwendungsfahig, or "fitfor combat")? Most importantly, what is the tone of this cartoon?
In this vein, the Dadaists held, exactly one hundred years ago, what they calledThe First International Dada Fair, Berlin, June 2020.
See the image below, especially the sculpture hanging from the ceiling? That sculpture was made by John Heartfield and Rudolf Schlichter. If you want to explore political art, research John Heartfield :https://www.getty.edu/art/exhibitions/heartfield/
He’s a rabbit hole of a topic from which you may never emerge. An unabashed lampooner of the madness and folly of fascism.
First International Dada Fair, Berlin, June 1920
Gathered under the John Heartfield and Rudolf Schlichter sculpture Prussian Archangel (a swine's head poking out of a Prussian uniform) are participants in the opening of the First International Dada Fair at the Otto Burchard Gallery in Berlin, June, 1920.
( fromhttps://www.johnheartfield.com/John-Heartfield-Exhibition/john-heartfield-art/berlin-dada-art-grosz-heartfield-hoch#161)
The Berlin Dadaists were pioneers ofphotomontage. Go back to chapter 33 and look at Hannah Höch’sCut with the Kitchen Knife (pp. 396-397). What critique is she making of Weimar culture?
–The bo Photomontage 1932
Finally, one of Heartfield’s images calledAdolf the Superman Swallows Gold and Spouts Rubbish (photomontage 1932). Food for thought.
">