The Impact of CALL in Learning Writing Skill
A research proposal submitted as a partial fulfilment for the requirement of the course ENGL 4180 Research Method. Mentored by Dr. Abdulaziz B Sanosi.
Do not try to change items inBLUE
Do Not Change Format, Font Colour, Size, Margins, Spacing, or Background.
Contents
Your Research Title.1
Background:3
Research Problem4
Research Questions4
Research Hypotheses4
Research Objectives4
Literature Review5
Research Methods6
Sample6
Data Collection6
Data Analysis6
Bibliography7
The Impact of CALL in Learning Writing Skill
Background:
Writing skills are considered one of the most difficult language skills for many students, not only writing in English, but writing in the mother tongue is not easy for some students, and in fact mastering the writing skill requires more effort.
Research Problem
1. Spelling: It is one of the most difficult axes that students can face, and its difficulties increase when the letter is consistent with the sound it represents, which may cause difficulty for the spelter.
2- The calligraphy: indicates the motor activity involved in the writing process.
3. Expression or creation: refers to the most innovative part of the writing process.
Research Questions
What are the difficulties of learning to write in English?
What are the degree of difficulties of learning to write in the English language that students face?
What is writing and its importance?
What are the stages of the writing process for learning the English language?
Research Hypotheses
1-See the literature and studies related to the study.
2. Develop the study tool and ensure its honesty and reliability.
3. Taking the necessary approvals to carry out the field study from all the relevant authorities.
4. The study community determines the teachers of English language for the basic stage classes.
Research Objectives
Classification of the difficulties of learning to write in the English language facing students
The basic classes from the viewpoint of their teachers, through several questions we asked earlier in this article.
Literature Review
Previous studies related to the difficulties of learning to write in the English language varied in terms of their objectives
And methods of selecting samples in each of them, and the tools used to collect data for those studies.
In terms of goals, they have varied, including what aims to identify the difficulties of written cohesion, such as studying
Blote & Bletz (2002, and others) aimed at identifying the difficulties of learning to write in the language
English in general, such as the Four-Way and Scientific Study (2005), but this study aims to identify
Difficulties in learning to write in the English language for students of elementary grades from the basic education stage.
Research Methods
Research methods taken to conduct this research determine:
1- The study problem.
2- The study's goal and questions.
3- The importance of the study.
4- Study terms.
5- Study limits
6- Study limitations.
Sample
The sample of the study was chosen by stratified random method, at the rate of 8% of the study population, after identification
Sample size according to Bartlett tables for probability samples according to the gender of the teacher and the supervising authority
An English teacher and tutor are regular in basic education
As the sample reached (351)
Grades (4-6) for the academic year 2017/2018, and the table shows that.
total
|
Private school
|
State school
|
school
gender
|
sample
|
society
|
sample
|
society
|
sample
|
society
|
58
|
698
|
38
|
461
|
20
|
237
|
teacher (male)
|
293
|
3523
|
266
|
3203
|
27
|
320
|
teacher (female)
|
351
|
4221
|
|
|
Data Collection
The stability of the study tool was confirmed by using two methods: the internal consistency method using an equation
Alpha - Cronbach, and the test method (retest - Test)
Apply the questionnaire to (30) individuals from outside the study sample, and re-apply them after two weeks, and after
The test stability coefficient was calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient between the results of the two applications, and the following table shows the results.
Pearson
|
Cronbach Alpha
|
Specialization
|
number
|
0.87
|
0.81
|
Difficulties writing coherent words and phrases.
|
1
|
0.78
|
0.86
|
Academic cohesion difficulties.
|
2
|
0.74
|
0.88
|
The difficulties of written expression and its organization.
|
3
|
0.88
|
0.90
|
Total mark
|
Data Analysis
Mathematical averages and standard deviations were extracted to measure the degree of difficulties
Learn to write in the English language in public and private schools at the Directorate of Education.
The mean and standard deviations were extracted according to:
Supervising authority and gender.
To calculate the stability coefficient a Pearson correlation coefficient and the Alpha Cronbach equation were used.
Bibliography
Bitchener, J. S (2005). The Effect Of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on
ESL Student Writing, Journal of Second Language Writing. Vol.14, No.
3,191-205
Bletz, H. & Blote, A. (1993). A Longitudinal Study an Dysgraphic Hand Writing
Primary School. Journal Of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 26, No. 10.
Dana, F. (2007). Preparing Teachers to Respond to Student Writing. Journal of
Second Language Writing. Vol.16, No. 3.
Elbw, P.(2002). Writing to publish is for every student. In C.Weber (ED),
Publishing with students: A comprehensive guide. (p. 1-8) Postsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Fageeh, A. (2003). Saudi Collage students Beliefs Regarding their English
Writing Difficulties. Doctoral Dissertation, School of Graduate Studies and
Research, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Gerson, Sharon J. ; Gerson, Steven M. (2006). Teaching Writing Process and
Product. Ohio: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Heard, G. (2002). The revision toolbox: Teaching techniques that work.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Howarth, P. E. (2007). Creative Writing and Schiller’s Aesthetic Education.
Journal of Aesthetic Education. Vol.41, No.3, 41-58.
Icy, L.(2008). Student Reactions To Teacher Feedback In Two Hong Kong
Secondary Classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, In Press,
Corrected Proof, Available online 20 February 2008.
Parsons, L.(2001). Revising and editing. Markham, ON: Pembroke.
Ritchey, K.(2008). The Building Blocks of Writing: Learning to Write Letters and
Spell Words. Reading and Writing. 21. 27-47.
Rivers, W & Temperley, M (1978). A Practical Guide of the Teaching of English
as a Second or Foreign Language. (Last digit) printing, New York, Oxford
University Press.
Saddler,B.(2003). “But teacher, I added a period!” Middle schoolers learn to revise.
Voices from the Middle, 11(2), 20-26.
Tompkins, Gail E.(2008).Teaching Writing Balancing Process and Product.
Ohio: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Torres, J. & Ash,M. (2007). Cognitive development. In Encylopedia of special
education: A reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults
with disabilities and other exceptional individuals.
">