Toggle navigation
Ask Questions
Ask
Answer Questions
Answer
Users
FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
Truckloads of waste contaminated with cadmium ma
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
<p>2) As you can see from the question, it says, "If the mean level of cadmium **exceeds** the allowable amount of 1 milligram per XXXXX for a XXXXXXXX landfill...". XXXXXXXXX, XX XXX XXXXXXX XXX the XXXXXX in our XXXX **XXXXX** XXX test XXXXX, or XXX/X. Therefore we XXXX use a **Right-tailed XXXX**. This XXXX XXXXX us to XXXX for XXX XXXXXX XXXX exceed 1mg/X XXXX XXX XXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. ---</p> <p>X) For XXXXXXXX techniques, I XXXXXXX using the XXXXXX Random XXXXXXXX XXXXXX. It XX XXXXXXXX XXX XXXX common XXX easiest XX XXXXXXX. XX XXXX XXXX a single population XX things we want to XXXX daily, and therefore, XXXXX't necessitate that XX XX XXXX more XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX techniques. XXXXXXX, XXXX Simple Random XXXXXXXX, having a large XXXXXX size is critical to XX representative of XXX entire XXXXXXXXXX XX trucks. So, for XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX, it does matter a lot how big the XXXX of XXX XXXXXX is. ---</p> <p>X) First, I'll explain XXXX a Type I XXXXX and Type II error XXX XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XXXX XXXXXXX it in XXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXX.</p> <p>Type I Error: XXXXXXXXX the null XXXX it XX XXXX XXXX XX Error: XXXX to reject the null when it is XXXXX</p> <p>So answering the XXXXX XXXX of XXX question, if we XXXXXX that XXX mean levels XX cadmium are greater XXXX X, therefore XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX hypothesis (XXXXX says XXX XXXX XXXXXX of XXXXXXX XXX XXXXX to 1), XXXX we XXXX have a Type I XXXXX. If XX accidentally XXXXXX XXXX the mean levels of cadmium XXX XXXXXXX XXXX 1, then we XXXXX the XXXXXXX XX spend more money driving the trucks to a XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXX, when in fact, we didn't XXXX to XX that.</p> <p>XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX part XX XXX question, I believe XXXX a XXXX II XXXXX XX much XXXX serious. This XX because XX the XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX and XXXXXX a XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX, it's not the end XX the XXXXX. However, XX the XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX harmful XXXXXX of XXXXXXX XXXX a XXXXXXXX when they XXXXXXX't XX, that XXX have serious XXXXXXXXXXXX on XXX surrounding population XX well as XXXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXXX. Type II XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX very harmful. ---</p> <p>5) XXXXX a p-XXXXX of 0.03 (XXX XXXXXX less XXXX 0.XX) XX XXXX than XXX XXXXX XXXXX of X.XX, we reject the XXXX hypothesis. XXXXX is XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXX the mean level of XXXXXXX in the truckloads being XXXXXXXXX into the XXXXXXXX exceeds XXX 1mg/L XXXXX, XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XX deposited in a XXXX appropriate landfill XXXXXXX XXXX.</p>">
