Physical evidence is the object that is found at a scene of crime. It is anything that is present at the crime scene and can link the perpetrator to the crime. It may consist of a wide variety of prints such as fingerprints, footprints, handprints, tidemarks, cut marks, and tool marks. It could also include fibers and hair. The analysis of most of the physical evidence is carried out by making impressions in plaster, taking images of marks, or lifting the fingerprints from objects encountered (USLegal, 2016). The impressions and images acquired are used at a later time for comparison in an effort to draw various identification modes.
XXX XXXX XX physical XXXXXXXX that XXXXX be found in the crime scene includes XXXXX distribution and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX touched. XXX offender’s injuries could XXXX count as XXXXXXXX evidence. The XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX also XXXXXX XXX bloody footprints XX the XXXX which XXXXX XXXXX XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX. Tire track XXXXX at the parking lot XXXXX also XX of great significance since it could XXXX with XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX which could link and XXX XXXXXX on the presence of XXX offender’s presence at the XXX.
XXX XXXXXX Prints and Impressions XXXXXXX in XXX forensic lab would XX used to identify, XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX skin XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXX in XXX bar XXXX XX XXXXXXX. This would be for XXX efforts XX recovering XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXX for comparisons with XXX murder XXXXXXX XXXXXX. The XXXXXXXXXXXX XX this XXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXX XX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXX matches XX the XXXX XXXXXX in the XXXX parking lot. It is also in XXXX section XXXXX the latent prints that the police XXXXXXXX XX XXXXX XXXXXXXX will XX XXXXXXXX.
XXX XXXX a century XXX, latent print has grown to become XXXXX the XXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX of forensic XXXXXXXX. XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, the XXXXXXXX investigators could XXXXXXXXXX be XXX to XXX perpetrator XX the XXXXX XX XXX use XX latent print (WVSP, 2016). Once the latent XXXXXX XXX developed and preserved, the impressions are XXXX to XX studied and examined through XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX XXX verification.
The XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX another XX XXX Forensic XXXXXXXXXX that XX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX examination XX document XXXXXXXX related XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXXX could include checks, withdrawal forms, XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXXXX XXXXX, XXXXXXX notes, XXXXXXXXX letters, firearm transcription XXXXXXX, insurance XXXXX forms and XXXXXXXXXXXXX (WVSP, XXXX). In XXXX case, the XXXXXXXXXXX letters found XX Michelle’s XXXX would be analyzed at the Questioned XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX.
The XXXXXX, treated XX a XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXX to XXXXX standards or eliminate a suspect by making evaluations on XXX handwriting, or hand printing, including letters and XXXXXXXX (WVSP, 2016). In most XXXXX, additional examination is XXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX documents if it XX believed to be an XXXXXXXXX lead. XXX evaluation XX XXX used XXX XXXX XX XXXX through XXX comparison XX XXXXXXXXXXX of light.
The murder victim who is XXX XXXX also XX treated as evidence amidst the XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XX responsible XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXX of XXXXX of XXX victim. XXX XXXXXXX examiner in the forensic department XXXX XXXXXX in the identification XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX injuries. XXX pathologist may then issue expert testimony in XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX cause XX death as XXXX as the extent XX the injuries.
Before XXX XXX stabbed to XXXXX by XXX, they engaged in a fierce fight XXXXXXX them. XXXX XXXXX have XXX to XXX XXXXXXXX XX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX at the XXXXX. Therefore, XXX criminalist XXXXXX XXXXX on analyzing the blood XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXX XX retrieve samples XXX XXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXXXX that XXXX handle XXXX XXXX XX XXX Serology unit. XXXX XX a DNA XXXX XXXX is responsible for analysis XX XXXXXXXX from XXXXXX XXXXXXX individuals XXX property with XXX XXXXXXXXX XX identifying XXX individualizing XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX as a part of that evidence (XXX, n.d). The DNA XXXXXXX acquired from XXX sample XXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXX as a step XX identifying XXX perpetrator. XXXXXXX, the XXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXXXXX blood, but XXXX hair, skin or XXXXX XXXX may have been XXXX XXXXXX the encounter XX XXX two XXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXX is XXXX the Central XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX Section that could examine XXX items XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX as the bottles that XXXX thrown XXXXXX in XXX XXXX. XXXX section analyses XXXXXXX there is XXXXXXXX or absence of biological material that would XX suitable for DNA analysis. XXX scene XXXXXXX XXX other XXXXXXX collected XXXX XXX crime XXXXX will XX XXXXX for testing XX XXXX section of XXX XXXXXXXX laboratory.
XXXXXX acceptance XX evidence, the XXXXXXX Evidence Receiving Section provides XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX accepting XXX XXX physical evidence recovered into the laboratory. XXXX receipt, XXXX piece XX evidence is assigned a unique XXXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX information is entered XXXX XXX Laboratory Information XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX. The XXXXXXXX of the evidence XX XXXXXXX at this unit XX they XXX distributed to the forensic scientists for analysis or comparison (WVSP, XXXX).
It is important to treat XXX the XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX extreme XXXXXXX in order to prevent XXXXXXXXXXXXX that XXXXX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX reliability. The correct handling and XXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX XXXXX contribute to a successful investigation. The processing of XXXXXXXX XXXXX take XXXX; therefore, it is important for XXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX work XXXX in hand XXXX the XXXXXXXXXXXX towards XXXXXXX linkage patterns between XXX victim XXX XXX XXXXX perpetrator. Scientists make an XXXXXXXX contribution in XXXXXX XXX XXXX out of physical XXXXXXXXX that XXX acquired from a XXXXX scene.
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXX recent XXXX become XXX XXXXXXXX XX criminal XXXXXXX XXXXX they are XXX XXXXXXXX XX all the available XXXXXXXX evidences recovered from a XXXXX XXXXX. XXX XXXXX XXX XXXXX XX the XXXX significant XXXXXXX in any XXXXXXXXXX due to the sensitivity of XXX responsibilities that are XXXXXXX out at XXXX XXXXXXXX. XXX evidence processing XXX XXXXXXXX should be procedural so as XX XXXXXXX XXX chances XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX could lead XX XXXX of XXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXX
XXX. (n.d).Crime Lab. Retrieved XXXX XXXXXXX Department XX XXXXXXX: https://XXXXX.XXX/XXXXX/
USLegal. (2016).XXXXXXXX Evidence Law & Legal Definition. XXXXXXXXX from USLegal: http://definitions.uslegal.com/p/physical-evidence/
XXXX. (2016).Forensic Laboratory. Retrieved from XXXX XXXXXXXX State Police: XXXX://www.XXXX.gov/XXXXX/XXXXX/CrimeLab.XXXX