When XXXXXXX a XXXX there is no XXX XX tell XX it will XXXX head or XXXXX, even more if we XXXX it four times it XXX XXXX XXX tails or XXX XXXXX, XXXX XXX possible results. XXX XXXX that XXX probability of XXXXXXX XXXX XX 0.5 does XXX XXXX XXX result XXXX XX two tails and XXX XXXXX, it means XXXX XXX XXXX XXXXX you XXXXXX XXX experiment the number XX XXXXX we get XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX number of XXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XXXX tend to be XXX XXXX.
XXXXXXX #X: Companies,XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX extra value in order to XXXXXX a XXXXXXXX for their products, (XXX’s XXXXXXXX a computer) How do XXXX know how XXXX XXXXXX they charge?
XXXXXXX that XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX a computer XX returned XXX to any damage or malfunction XX X% or X.08 and the XXXX to replace it is $XXX. XX XXX company XXXX which computer XXXXX XX bad, it could XXXX charge $800 for XXXXX computers and $X for the rest. However, XXX XXXXXXX can’t XXXX which XXXXXXXXX will be XXXXXXXX. Because XXXXX X in XXXXX 100, or same as 1 in XXXXX 25 will XX returned, they should charge at least XXX/XX = $XX for the extended warranty.
XXX XXXX in XXX XXXXX
We XXX’t XXXXXXX XXX XXXXX run behavior of a chance phenomenon XXX XX its own XXXXXX nature. However, due XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX of the experiment XXXX XX knowing the quantity of possible favorable outcomes XX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX supposing XX XXXX idea of XXX XXXXXXXXXX XX a particular outcome XX XXXXXX we XXX XXXXXXX XXX log run pattern theoretically, XXX XXXX result will only be XXXX experimentally in a XXXX series of repetitions.