Purchase of the surgical robotic unit.
Name
Date
Institution
Discussion XX the economic factors that must be considered XXXXXX the XXXXXXXX XX the surgical robotic XXXX.
XXX development of XXXXXXXX robotic XXXXX in the XXXXXX XXXXXX XXX improved XXX level of XXXXXXXX XXX efficiency in the XXXXXX sector. Therefore, XXXXXXXX factors XXXX be XXXXXXXXXX before XXX purchase of the surgical robotic XXXXX XXXX the level XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX-related to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX, XXX surgeon's desires XX XXXXXXX XXX sustainability XX XXX XXXXXX. The system XX XXXXXXX to a range XX advantages like its ability XX XXXXXXX complex XXXXXXX at a time, and XXXXX minimization during XXX XXXXXXX (XXXXXX, &XXX; XXXXXX, XXXX). XXX XXXXX XX XXXXX capital XXXXXX therefore be XXXXXXXXXX to XXXXXXX the quality XX skills XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XX XXXXX XXX XXXXXX and the XXXXX of technology whether it XX more XXXXXXXXXX XX a XXXXX cost XXXXXXXX to XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX.
Who XXX the stakeholders in XXXX scenario (both internal and external)?
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX related to this scenario XXX the workers especially XXXXXXXX in the integrated XXXXXXXX XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX XXX need XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, the XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX manufacture and seller, and XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX management XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX involved in decision XXXXXX of this XXXXXX.
What is XXX XXXXXX XX the various stakeholders XX acquiring a XXXXXXXX robotic unit?
XXX system will XXXX to XXXX XXX work XX the XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX the XXXXXXXX XXX efficiency XX the XXXXXXXX results. The XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX the reduction in surgical XXXX, minimized XXXXXX, XXX reduction in the XXXXXXX time (Fiani at.XX, XXXX). XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX an XXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX and XXX hospital will gain a competitive advantage.
What XXX the external XXX internal factors XXXX XXXX XXXXXX XXX decision?
Internal XXXXXXX will XXXXX XXXX the XXXXX, XXXXXX XX the XXXXXX, XXXXXX of XXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXXX of XXXX for the XXXXXX, surgeons' preference, and XXXXXXXXXXXX XX the required XXXXXXX XXXXX to reach XXX XXXXXXXX level XX XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX.
External factors XXX social-cultural XXXXXXX, environmental XXXXXXX, XXX the patient XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX the XXX system.
How XXXXX XXXXXXXXX (XXXXXXXX) XXXXX?
The XXXXXXXX may XXXXXXXXXX or feel XXXXXX XXXXX trusting their life XX a XXXXXXXXXX system basing XXXXX negativity XX XXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX by the machine, XXX XXXXXXX, lack of power, or bugs. The basis XX those who would XXXXXXX XXX system would be because it XXXX XXXXXX the XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX during the XXXX surgeries XXXXX the system unit XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX time XXX XXXXXXXXX wounds. XXX reactions XXX XXXX XXXX age, level XX exposure, XXX XXXXXXXXX levels with XXXXX people XXXX likely XX XXXXXXX it and those XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX of exposure.
How XXXX acquiring this XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX’s ability XX compete?
The XXXXXX XXXX increase the XXXXXXX's competitive XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX procedures XXX more XXXXXXXX XXX efficient. XXXXX it has XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX it XXXX minimize wounds, perform complex surgery at a time, and XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX (XXX, & Das, 2017). XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX patients XXXX up XXX treatment because XXX patient XXXXX is XXXXXXXXX and fear XX XXXXXXXXXX. Because the system XXXXX XX output is high, XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXX will XXXX be high and improve XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX the overall hospital performance.
Reference
XXXXX, X., Quadri, S. A., XXXXXXXX, M., XXXXXX, X., Berman, B., XXXX, J., & XXXXXXX, J. (2020). Impact of robot-assisted spine XXXXXXX on XXXXXX care quality XXX neurosurgical economics: a systemic XXXXXX. Neurosurgical review, 43(X), XX-25.
Wilson, X., & Badani, K. (XXXX). Competing XXXXXXX Systems: X XXXXXXX. XXXXXXX Urology: XXX Next Frontier, an Issue of Urologic XXXXXXX, E-Book, XXX.
Yip, M., & Das, N. (2017). XXXXX XXXXXXXX for XXXXXXX. arXiv XXXXXXXX XXXXX:1707.XXXXX, X.