Critical Thinking
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX XXX case
XXXXXXX needs compensation XXX the XXXXXXX incurred XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX delivery. XX should be XXXXXXXXXXX by XXXX the seafood XXXXXX’s XXXXXXXXXX XXX the XXXX XXXXXXXXXX since he suffered in situations XXXX XXXXX XXXX corrected. XXX Seafood XXXXXX’s XXXXXXX ought XX XXXX XXXXXXX the safety XX their employee and XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXX conditions XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. XXX government through XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXX ensure correctness XX XXX instruments XXXX in XXX sewer lines. The legal issues includes: XXXXXXX heaven’s failing XX provide safety XXX employee, the city XXXXXXX to XXXX XXX trench XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX leading to the accident, suing the XXXXXX’s XXXXXXXX Supplies XXX not XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX for the faulty XXXXXXX.
Evaluating XXX XXXXX XXXXXX in the XXXX
XXXXXXX XXX employer, the XXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX of protecting XXX XXXXXXXXX and in case XX injuries XXXXXXXX during XXXX, XXX XXXXXXXX will have to compensate for the damage caused. XXX worker XXXXXXXX XXXXXX purchase XXX employees compensation insurance against punitive damages (Fair XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX, Originality XXXX). XXX XXXXXXXX of this XXXX XX XXXX Thomson XXX not offered XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX weakness is the failure XX Thomson to XXXX the XXXXXXXXX before XXX damage.
The city XX Bayou XX XXXXX , XXX city is XX XX sued for failing to meet the obligation of slopping XXXXXXXX as this led to XXX accident. The city is XXXX for XXXXXXXXXX (The XXXXXXX Tort Claims Act). This has weakness of subjecting XXXXXXX go lengthy XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX.
City employee, XXX XXXXX XXXX XX XXXX XX Thomson; he XXXX XX XXXX XXX negligence on his XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX casualty XXXXXXX XX the damage. XXXX suit will XX XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX did not do XXX required duty that XXXXX XXXX prevented XXX XXXXXXX (Fair XXXX XXX).
Federal government XXXXXX immunity XXX XXXX XXX XXXX may XXXX it difficult XXX XXXXXXX to XX successful in the lawsuit although it is XXX XXXX of the XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX cities and XXXXXXXXX. XX will be challenging bringing injury claim XXXXXXX the government Federal employee XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXX sued XXXXX the XXXXXXX government has immunity XXXX law XXXX. Thomson will XXXX XX seek the XXXXX XX XXXXXXX which would derail and deter XXX process.
Harold’s Building XXXXXXXX will XX XXXX XXX XXXXXXX to XXXXXX compliance XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXX. This XXXX XXXXXXX XXX third party XXXXX XXX XXX XXX filled in the workers XXXXX. It XXXX XX a XXXXX lawsuit filed in the XXXXXXX state court. XXX XXXXXXXX is XXXX the suits compensations XXX mostly not XXXXXXXXXXX. The strength here is XXXX XXX lawsuit will XXXXX compensation XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX expenses.
Deductions of XXX XXXX
XXX federal government XXXXXX be sued XXX to the immunity and sovereignty unless XXX XXX XXX XXXXX XX proceed(XXXXX, 20903)
Manufacturers can XX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX failure XX meet XXX customer XXXXXXXXXXXX leading to XXXXXXX(XXXXX, XXXX)
Employers can also be sued XXX XXXXXXXXXX, failure to XXXXXXX XXXX working conditions and experienced malpractices(Alan, 2003)
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Thomson XXXX successfully XXX the lawsuits against XXX XXXXXXXX, the city of Bayou XX Batre and XXXX employee, XXX XXXXX XXX their negligence XXXX XXX to the damages incurred XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX.
XXX lawsuits XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX government and the XXXXXXXX XX XXX federal government will not be XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX are given immunity XX XXX XXX and may need XXXXXXX XXXXXXX. Thomson XXXX XXXX it challenging XX sue the XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXX need the right XX XXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXX, C. (2003). The XXXXX framework of human resource XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXX XX: Fair employment, neglegence, XXX implications XXX XXXXXXXX XXX practitioners.XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX , XXX-154.
XXXXX, X. X. (2018). Consumer Product Failure Causing Personal XXXXXX Under XXX No-Fault XXXXXXXX compensation scheme in XXXXXXXXX -a let off for Manufacturers .XXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX policy , XXX-XXX.
Vicki, X. X. (XXXXX). Suing XXX Federal Government: XXXXXXXXXX and Immunity and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX.