Article XXXXXX: The XXXXXXXX of Documents, Revisited
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX
Date
XXX author, XXXXXXXX XXXXXX, XX an XXXXXXXXXXX studies Professor who attained XXX XX. D XXXX University of XXXXXXXXX. XX works in XXX XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX in XXX University of XXXXXXXXXX. XX XXX 2019 article entitled, “XXX XXXXXXXX of Documents, XXXXXXXXX,” he investigates the XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX by XXXXX contributions: XXX XXXXX contribution is XXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX of the XXXX document; XXX second contribution is location of documents as XXXXX XX four-category ontology developed by E. X. Lowe; and an analysis XX XXX XXXXXX XX document as XXXXXXXXXX XX X. Smith.
XXX XXXXXXXXXX of a XXXXXXXX as backed XX Buckland’s XXXXXXXXX XX Briet four XXXXX XX determining when any XXXXXX XXXXXXX a XXXXXXXX is rather intriguing. XX XX quite XXXXXXXXXXX that XXX XXXXXXXXXX of a document XXXXXX XXXX its perception as an XXXXXX as XXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX this sentence. XXX XXXXX XXXX is that an object XXXX be XXXXXXXX in XXXXXX. XXX second XXXX is XXXX XXX object XXXX XX utilized XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX an individual in XXX XXXX XX evidence XXXXXX, XXXX). The third rule is that the object XXXX in XXXX XXXXXXX way XXXX been XXXXXXXXX. XXX fourth XXXX XX that XXXXX XXXX XX the XXXXXXXXXX XXXX the XXXXXX is a document.
XX XX XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, to understand the concepts XX locating XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX to category XXXXXX XX XXXX, and analysis of XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX XX Smith. XXXXXXXXX to my understanding, XXXXXX offers that XXXXXXXXX XXX vested XX XXXXX binary XXXXXXXXXXXX. These distinctions XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX properties, universals and XXXXXXXXXXX, as XXXX XX concreta XXX abstrac
ta. XXXX has XXX been clearly articulated XXX XX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX to XXXXXXXXXX. Also, the relation of the status of documents to XXX social reality XXXXXXX as painted XX XXXX XXXXXX is XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, and hard XX XXXXXXXXXX.
References
Furner, X. (XXXX). The XXXXXXXX XX Documents, Revisited. Proceedings from the Document Academy, 6(X), X.