CoaXX XXXXX XXX an authoritative XXXXXXXXXX. He XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX forces his players XX deal XXXX XXXXXXX between XXX XXXXXXX XXX recognize compromise for a common XXXX. This XX most obvious in XXXXX XXXXX&XXXXX;s pairing XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX (XXXXX team leader) and XXXXX Bertier (XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX). XX XXXXXXX XXXXX players XX pair with black XXX refusing XX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX preferences, Coach Boone forced the players XX XXXX XXXX their XXXXXXXX directly. Despite initial frustration and XXXXXXXX all XXX XXXXX learn XX work towards a common goal. XXXX redirects their XXXXXXX from one another to a XXXXXX XXXXXXX. In this way Coach XXXXX XXX the XXXXX hand. He dictates how things XXXX XX and the players must conform XX meet a single XXXX together or all fail.
XX XXX XXXXX hand, XXXXX XXXXX XXX be considered more of a XXXXXXX. XX exists with the status XXX XXX XXXXXXX relationships XXX individuality XXXX XXXXXXX. XX XXXXXXXXX their views and XXXXXX his XXXXXXXX XX fit them. While XXXX is an XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXXXX this time XXXXXX (1976), XXXXX XXXXX would be XXXXXXXXXXX at XXXXXXXXXXX XXX white XXX black XXXX. Their individual XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX prevent them from XXXXXXX together and ultimately result in tension and fighting between the XXX XXXXX. Coach Yoast prizes the individual XX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX own XXXX, XXX this hampers XXXXXXXXXXX. In this particular setting, cooperation was more XXXXXXXXX than XXXXXXXXXX achievement.
XXX two team leaders show different leadership styles XX XXXX. XXXXXX XXXXXXXX is XXXXXX conscious XX XXXXXX and XXXXX in the way he believes a person XXXXXX XX. He XX what is considered an XXXXXXX-setting leader XXXXX he XXXXXXXXXXXX behaves a certain way to XX an example XXX others. Julius sticks to higher principles XXXX he XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX should XXXX up to XXX XXX just XXXXXXX.
Gerry XXXXXXX has a XXXXXXX style, XXX XXXXX is one XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXX XXXXX XX being the XXXXXXX. XXXXXX than purposefully XXX to lead in a XXX he XXXXXX he XXXXXX, XXXXX leads by being exactly who he is. In this XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX emotion XXX XXXXXX to XXX own personal principles. Whereas XXXXXX XXXXXXX XX XX the XXXXXXX you should XX, XXXXX XXXXX as the person he is.
XXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXX good qualities XXX some drawbacks. XXXXXXXXXX the most XXXXXXXX leadership XXXXXX XXX a XXXXXXX XX Coach Yoast XXX Gerry. XXXXXXXXXXXXX and personal XXXXXXXXXXX are XXXXXXXXX qualities XXXX a XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX (Coach Yoast). XX XX also important XXXXX on XXXX own principles and XXXXX with XXXX (Gerry).
XXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX about Coach XXXXX’s leadership XX XXXX XXXXX it XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXX term goal (cooperation to play XXX XXXX XXXXXXXX) in the long XXX you XXXX lose personal XXXXXXXXXXX. Personal achievement is what XXXXXX XXXXXXX to XX XXXXXX and XXXXXX XXXXXX players. XXX issue with XXX way Julius leads is XXXX not everyone may XXXXX on the same XXXXXXXXXX you XXXXXX XXXXXX XX XX. XX there XX XXXX a situation where what you XXXXXX do (based XX your XXXXXXXXXX) is XXXXXXXXX from XXXX you want XX XX (XXXXX XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXX) you XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX conflict that XXXXX XXXX it XXXXXXXXX XXX you XX XXXX a XXXXXXXX.