Toggle navigation
Ask Questions
Ask
Answer Questions
Answer
Users
FAQ
Login
Register
Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Due to formatting, images, tables, or paragraphs may be out of place or not shown. Rest assured that they will be included and formatted correctly in your purchased answer.
Details
Question Title:
social contract theory
Go Back to the Question
Answer Preview
<p>Hobbes XXXX XXXXXXXXX the XXXXX XXXXXX as machines, with their thoughts XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XX physical laws and XXXXXX XX XXXXX XXX XXXXXX, XXXXXX XXX reaction" who pursue their XXXX-XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. This XXXXX is an observation XXXX can be interpreted XXXXXXXXXX or simply XXXXXXXXXXXXX: if XXXXX individual XX relentless in XXXXXXX XXXX-XXXXXXXX, then every XXXXXXXXXX XX<strong>fit XXX survival</XXXXXX>( XXXXX't XXXX XXXX a negative thing, does it ?). If the individuals XXX intelligent, then XXXX realize XXXX<strong>XXXX-XXXXXXXX</XXXXXX>XXX<XXXXXX>XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX</strong>do not necessarily XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX with each XXXXX. There can XX a<XXXXXX>XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX-dependence</XXXXXX>between XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX different things, XXXX is XXX of the core XXXXXXXXXX of business, XXX XXXXXXX. XXXXXX XXX are XXXXXX XX self-XXXXXXXX are XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX it XXXX negative experiences they XXX, but self-XXXXXXXX being a XXXXXX-edged sword, you can encounter people XXX just use it to "XXX you" , while you XXX XXXX XXXXX people who XXX it XX help you in a particular XXX. XXXXXXXXXX in this universe XXX the nature of a XXXX: it's double-sided - only a sharp mind XXX turn XXX coin wisely in each second, XXXXXX it fit for the particular situation. It's thus XXX XXXX or the repression XX XXXX-XXXXXXXX that XX XXX XXXXXXXX to XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX moral question, XXX an XXXXXXXXXXX approach toward living XXXX XXXXXX.</p> <p><XX></p> <p>(XXXX XX social contract XXXXXX ?)<XXXXXX>XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXX</strong>is the philosophy that XXXXXX XXXX a persons' moral XXX/or political XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX upon a<strong></XXXXXX><strong>XXXXXXXX</XXXXXX>XXXXX XXXX to XXXX the XXXXXXX in which XXXX live. There's a "transaction XX XXXXXX" meant to XXXXXXXXX a XXX XX shared XXXXXX among XXXXXXXXXXX XXX the XXXXX XX a XXXXXXXX set XX individual XXXXXX (that XXX XXXXX away).</p> <p>(XXX does a society come out XXXXX XX a XXXXXX XX XXXX XXXXXX?) Asociety based on this XXXXXX depends XX the slightly XXXXXXXXX interpretations XXXXXXX XXXXX XX analyse XXX idea.</p> <p>XXXX XXXXXXX' XXXX XX that XXXX individual is XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX that it has XXXXXXX XXXXXX for XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX. His XXXXXXXXXX statement XXX XXXX power XXX ultimately XXX back to the individual if the government fails XX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX based on the contract which XXX built XX protect the individual. Grotius' XXXXXXX XXXXXX XX "sui XXXXX" (XXXXX XXXXX own jurisdiction), XXX XX the same XXXX he XXXXXXXXXX XXX importance of each person XXXXXXXXXX each XXXXX's XXXXXX and not XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX's freedom.</p> <p>In XXXXXX XXXXXX' view XXXX-XXXXXXXX prevents the XXXX functioning of a society and XXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXX life of a human XX "brutal", "XXXXX" and "solitary" XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX of a contract XXXX XXXXX social life XXXXXXXX. Individuals in this form of existence are XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX. Such a XXXXXXXX is XXXX so XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX can, XXXXXXX<strong>XXXXX-XXXXXXXXX XXXXX,</XXXXXX> profit from respecting a XXXXXXXX XXX XX rules. XXX XXXXXXXXXX/the XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX collective agreement XX the XXXXXXXXXXX XX meant XX regulate the XXXXX XXXX define XXXXX interactions. XXX problem XXXXXXXXXXX here is XXXX XXX state can also XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, competing with other XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX of XXX XXXX-being XX XXX individuals XXXX are represented by the XXXXX XXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXXX, Hobbes' XXXXXX XX XXXX without a "XXXXXX of the power", humans would function even XXXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX they would not respect XXX law XX XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXX would XXX XXXXX XXXXXX in XXX XXXX XXX XXXX'd XXXX XX XX treated XXX XXXX XXXXX create XXXXXXXXXXX and XXXX of harmony.</p> <p>XX John Locke's view, XXXXXX XXXXX unite instinctively under XXX "Law of XXXXXX" to XXX XXXX XXXX other and XXX XXXXXX each XXXXX's XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXX's XXXXXX is XXXXXXX to XXXXXX' in that he XXXX XXXXXX that XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXXXXX XXX presence XX a XXXXXXXXXX that XXXXX be meant to protect XXXX XXXX those XXX XXX XX XXXXXX XXXX. Locke doesn't advocate near-XXXXXXXX authority as Hobbes does, but XXXXXX XXXXXXXX the XXXX of a government that XX the XXXXXXXXXX of the people that XXXX it, XXXX every judgmental XXXX would be based XX a XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX.</p> <p><XX></p> <p>(What do you XXXXXXXXXX believe XX the origin of XXXXXX?XX ethics an innate XXXXX XXXXX XXXX comes XXXXX XXXXX creating XXXXX XXXXXXXXX?XX is it XXX result of of something else?) XXX origin of ethics XXX XXX will XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXX XX human thinking. XX times change, XXXXXX XXXXXX. As people change, ethics change. XXXXXXXX we can find some XXXXXXX ethical rules that XXXXXXXXX their importance XXXXXX the centuries, XXXXX XXX frequent changes in XXX XXXXXXXX toward XXXXXXX questions all XXX time. Even the XXXX<em>XXXXXXXXX</em>fundamental XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX are debated in XXX era XX verbal XXXXXXX. I'd even XXXXX XXXX in this XXX the XXXXX compass and the XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX XX more XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX in XXX other times when people were XXXX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXX XXXXX it. The perception that in the XXXX people were more ethical in any regard XXX to be met with XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXXXXX XX the verbal freedom (if one can't talk about something, anyone XXX XXXX a XXXXXX impression XXXXX it). XXXXXX XXXXXXXX have XXXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX which XXXXX cause a XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX of how XXXXXXX individuals XXXXX and live XXXX a XXXXX perspective, but XXX significant XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXX XXX the XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX past XX that the individual of XXXXX XX seriously XXXXXXXXXXX from talking XXX XXXX.</p> <p>XXXX, XXX congruence XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX's imagination of how the world "should be" XXX how XXX XXXXX actually XX, has XX be XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX just XX XXXX. Just like in XXXXXXXX's XXXX, a constant XXX rigorous attention has to XX paid to XXX individuals' XXXXXXXXX to any ethical idea, XXXXXXXXX an idea remains XXXX an XXXX. In XXX case XX the social contract theory: can XX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX to it XXX% ?Can we affirm XXXX there XXX a XXXX when XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX it 100% ?XX XXX't affirm XXXX XXXX with XXXXXXXXXX. XXXX's XXXXXXX, just like in XXX case XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX, there's a XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX a XXX XX XXXXX and XXXXXXX - that XXX XX XXXXXXXXX by wishful XXXXXXXX.</p> <p>XXXXX it's important to XXX standards so that XXXXXX are XXXXXXXX XX XXXX up to XXXX, it's just XX XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXX re-XXXXX the relation between XXX idea XXX XXX individual XXXXXX to XXXXXXX it. If there's a discrepancy XXXXXXX the XXX, XXXX the XXXX can be worthless XXX it XXX create the illusion of XXX XXXXXXXXX XX a moral/XXXXXXX XXXXXX.</p>">
