XXXXXXXXX industries I believe that the argument XX which you speak is talking XXXXX an industry where jobs are declining. XXXX is XXXXXXX called a XXXXXX XXX it calls XXXX your XXXXX XX higher moral ground to protect XXX helpless XXXXXXX XXXX cheaper foreign XXXXXXXXXXX Industry XXXXXXXX XXXX that it may be possible for XXX XXXXXXXX XX a XXXXXX XX XXXXXXX in the XXXXXX market, however it needs to XX protected before it can be XXXXXXXXX. XXX problems with this XXXXXXXX is XXXX you XXX make this XXXXXXXX for XXX XXXXXXXX, XXXX in one XXXX cannot XXXXXXX XXXX, XXX XXX XXXXXX who XXXXXX XXXX XXXX have XXXXXXXX to XXXX based on it. XX it XXX XXXX that an XXXXXXXX XXXXXX time XX grow, then XXXXXXXXX would XX XXXXXXX to XXX XXXXX XXXXX into it XXX the businessmen who ventured into that XXXXXXXX XXXXX XX willing XX take on XXX XXXX to XXXX up to that point.
b.XX&XXXXX;s a XXXXXXXXXXX argument, XXX has no basis XXX job XXXXXXXXXX. XX XXXXXXXXX import XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX implicitly want XX retain XXXX seeking activities. XXXXXXXXXX, actually, XXXXXX competition XXX make industries XXXXXXXXXXX. The inefficient XXXXXXXXXX will XXXXX XX XXXX XX welfare XXX as XXXX as XXXXXXXXXX development of XXX techniques. XXXXX from that, when free trade XX XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX labor XXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX being XXXX inefficiently in the XXXXXXXX can XX transferred to XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXX restriction which can XXXX encourage rent seeking activities should XXX be XXXXXXXXX.
Yes, for those XXXXXXX in XXXXX XXXXXXXX XX mass XXXXXXXXXX depend XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXX time being till that economy develops XXX XXXXXXXXXX can XX XXXXXXXXXXX to other sectors.
">