Title of Periodical:Computer Law & Security Review
Images Not Shown
Volume34 Number1Month/Year 2018
Title of Article:XXXXX XXX quagmire–the complicated XXXXXXXXXXXX between XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX and XXXXXXXX protection law.
Domain XXXXXXXXX:Consumer protection and the XXX
XXXXXX(s):Svantesson, Dan XXXXXX B.
Question/XXXXXXX: The XXXXXXXXXXXX between XXXXXXXX protection laws XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX.
XXXXXXX:
The author, in XXXX XXXXXXX, studies the XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX data protection law XXX consumer protection law in XXX context of the XX’s online XXXXXXXXX. XXX author’s main argument XX XXXX while data XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX are often perceived to XX complementary, the reality XX XXXX XXXX protection XXXX may limit XXX effectiveness XX XXXXXXXX protection law. XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX using the XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXX a XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX level, or floor, in XXX XXXXXXXXXX of consumers, while XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX a minimum XXX XXXXXXX acceptable XXXXX XXX legal XXXX use as data protection contends XXXX both the protection of XXXXXXXXXXX and the XXXX movement XX data. XXX author then XXXXXXXXX XXX fact that XXXXXXXXXXXX consumer XXX data XXXXXXXXXX XXXX such XX XXX XXXXXXX Data XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX (GDPR) in the EU XXXXXX XXXXXXX from regulatory uncertainty, XXXX XXX XXXXXXX a XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX investigation XX XXXXX violations, and does XXX XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX on the correct XXXXXX of XXXXXX XXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXX liability claims are pursued against XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX law. XXX XXXXXX ends with a tentative framework XXXX XXX XXXX protection XXXXXX filed XXXXXXX third XXXXX controllers of XXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX data XXXXXXXXXXXX rights, XXX should XXXXXXX XXXX areas such XX XXXXXXXX XXX Pages XXX the Facebook Like Button.
XXXXXXXX:
I agree with XXX author’s XXXXXXXXXX XXXX data XXXXXXXXXX laws and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX laws XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX in XXXXXXXX. XXXXXXX, as the majority of studies such XX XXXXX (XXXX) demonstrate, data protection and XXXXXXXX protection are typically in XXXXXXXXX, XXX major stakeholders XXXX XX third XXXXX XXXX controllers tend XX XXX in XXX assumption that the XXXXXXXXX XX XXXX types XX XXXX XXX in XXXXXXXXXXX. Hence, Svantesson’s XXXXXXXXX may XXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXX implementation XXXX considering the nuances in the relationship between data protection and consumer protection law.
XXXXXXXXXX (APA XXXXXX):
Rhoen, X. (2016). XXXXXX consent: XXXXXXXXX data XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX protection XXX.Internet XXXXXX XXXXXX,5(1), X-15.
XXXXXXXXXX, D. J. X. (XXXX). XXXXX XXX quagmire–XXX complicated XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX protection law XXX XXXXXXXX protection law. XXXXXXXX XXX &XXX; security review, 34(X), 25-36.
">