Apple’s IPAD pro vs Samsung Galaxy Tablet
Name
Institution
Apple’s IPAD pro vs Samsung Galaxy Tablet percentage differentiation
Both products are very similar and attract young adults aged 30 to 45. In the XXXXX age group XX XX XX XX, only X in 4 XXXXXX own them. XXX XXXXXXXXX price ofApple’s IPAD XXX is$29,900, while Samsung XXXXXX XXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX costs $21,XXX. XXXXX products XXXX XXXXXXXXX manufacturers such as XXXXXX go XXX $9,999. Currently,Apple’s XXXX pro usage in XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX 20% XXXXXXXX to Samsung’s XX%. XXXXX IPad such XX Techno and Lenovo XXXX XX XXX remaining XX% XX the XXXXXX share.
Images Not Shown
XXXXX’s IPAD pro
Images Not Shown
XXXXXXX XXXXXX Tab
XXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
Apple’s Ipad pro XX uniquely XXXXXXXX. The XXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX it easy XX use XXX to XXXXXXX solutions for XXXXXXXXX that XXXXXXXX their wants. XXX XXXXXXX, XXXXX Ipad pro XXX a XXXXXXX space XX 256GB XXXXX Tecno canon pro, which XX XXX competitor, has a storage space XX 64GB (Coleman, 2020). XXXXXXX has an XXXXXXXX memory XX XXXXX (Coleman, XXXX). Most XXXXXXXXX would wish XX purchase Apple Ipad pro XXX to XXX massive storage XXXXXX. When XXX device XXX a XXXXX XXXXXXX system, it XXXXXXXX XXX Ipad from XXXXXXX out of storage XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXX Apps and XXXXX information.
XXXXX XXXX pro is a product XX Apple Inc Company, XXXXX XXXXX it have durable XXXXXXXX and software applications. The XXXXXXX XXX iPadOS, XXXXX increases its XXXXX XXXXX streaming XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX (Kush, XXXX). XXXX XXXXXXX XX not available in other XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX. For XXXXXXX, Samsung Electronics, which XX XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX Apple XXXX XXX competitor, lacks a quality ecosystem (Kush, XXXX). XXXXXXX’s Ipad XXXX XXX XXXX a whole OS and XXX XXX apps and XXXXXXXX to XXX XXXXXXXXX. XX that XXXX, Apple’s Ipad Pro has a substantial competitive XXXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXX.
XXXXX’s XXXX Pro has a more competitive advantage XXX XX XXX brand. XXX XXXX XXXX XXX the XXXXX can XXXX XXXX XX win XXXX XXXXXXXXX (XXXX, XXXX). XXXXX’s products are XXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXX globe (XXXXXXX, XXXX). Its XXXXX is XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, and it’s XXXXXX linked XXXX XXXX quality.
Weaknesses
XXXXX’s iPad XXX XXX a XXXXXX price XXXX compared with XXX competing XXXXXXXX. For example, Apple Ipad pro costs $29,900, XXXXX Samsung Ipad XXXX XXXXXXX features costs $21,440. Lenovo XXXX XXX $X,XXX (XXXXXXX, 2020). The price XXX Apple XXXX XXX is almost thrice XXXXXX’s XXXX. Apple Inc. sells its products at a XXXX rate XXX to XXXX production XXXXX. XXXXX’s Ipad XXX XXX XXXXXXXXX designed, XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX to other competing XXXXXXXX (Nielson, 2019). However, this XXXXXXX may make XXX XXXXXXX XXXX a low, competitive XXXXXXXXX in the XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX cannot afford it. XXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX the product XXXXXX to XXXX socioeconomic XXXXXX, XXXXX can reduce XXX XXXXXX XX the XXXXXXX’s sales (XXXX, XXXX).
Opportunities
The product has the chance XX XXXXX broad XXXXXX segments. A XXXXXX reduction in the price XX the XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX more customers due XX the XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX the XXXXXX (Vasilaki, Tsakalidis, Georgios, XXXX). The aspect XXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXX the XXXXXX of sales of the XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXX can create an XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX innovative XXXXXXXXXX XXXX could XXXX to XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXX (Nielson, 2019). XXXXX Apple XXXX a unique ecosystem in XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX, there are more chances XX developing further XXXXXX features that could XXXXXX the products (Kush, 2019). XXXXXXXXXX strategies could also increase the XXXXX’s XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXX creates more customers’ XXXXXXX.
Threats
XXXXX’s Ipad pro XXXXX stiff XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX Samsung’s XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX many XXXXXXXXX in the XXXXXX (Nielson, 2019). For example, while XXXXX’s Ipad XXX has XX XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX XXXXXX has 13MP+5MP (Coleman, XXXX). The XXXXXXX XXX XXXX many XXXXXXXXX, especially XXXXX XXX XXXXX Camera features, prefer XXXXXXX to XXXXX XXXX XXX. XXXX the XXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXX and many XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX online, XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX the XXXXX of XXXXX images.
XXXXX XXXX Pro XXX a Ram XX 4GB, while the Samsung Galaxy Pad XXX 6GB (XXXXXXX, XXXX). The XXXXXXX is a XXXXXX to XXXXX Ipad XXX since XXXX XXXXXXXXX may XXXXXXXX Ram XXXXXXX when making purchases. Some XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX with XXXXXX RAM XX increase XXX functionality of the phone (XXXX, 2019). Devices with lower XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX than XXX XXXX XXXX high XXX.
XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX of XXX XXXXXX
BCG matrix
XXXXXXXXX toXXXXX (2018), the growth-share XXXXXX XX a XXXXXXXX XXXX used by corporations XX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX of a XXXXX utilizing a quadrant. The quadrant XXX the relative XXXXXX share, which is represented in the horizontal axis, and XXX speed XXXXXX growth XXXXX is represented on the vertical XXXX. XXXXXXXXXX use XXX XXXXXX XX classify XXXXX business XXXXXXXXX into four XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX may either be doing XXXX, XXX the growth XXXX XXX how XXX XXXXXXXX is doing in XXXXX XX competitiveness, relative XXXXXX share. Using XXXX XXXX, XXXXXXXXXX XXX able to determine which of their XXXXXXXX to invest in, and XXXXX of XXX products are XXXXXX XXX XXX worth investing in at XXX given time.
Images Not Shown
XXX XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXX, B. (2020). Compare XXXXX XXXX Pro 10.5 XXXX XX-XX XXXXX vs. Samsung XXXXXX XXX XX - XXXXX XXXX XXX 10.X XXXX XX-XX 256GB vs. Samsung XXXXXX XXX S6 Comparison XX Price, XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX & XXXXXXXX: XXXXXXX Now. Retrieved 2020, from XXXXX://www.gadgetsnow.com/compare-XXXXXXX/XXXXX-XXXX-Pro-105-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXX-XX-XXXXXXX-Galaxy-Tab-XX
Davis, X. X. (2018). XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX.XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX Strategic XXXXXXXXXX, 644–XXX. doi: 10.1057/XXX-X-XXX-XXXXX-8_692
Kush X. ( 2019).Pestle And Swot Analysis Of Apple XXX 2016-2017 - 123Writing. (XXXX). XXXXXXXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXXX://XXXXXXXXXX.com/system_upgrade/XXXXXX-XXX-XXXX-analysis-of-XXXXX-XXX-2016-XXXX/
Nielson S. (XXXX).XXXXX's XXXXXXX XXXXXXX Strategy, XXXXXXX Differentiation. XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX://XXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXX/2014/XX/apples-premium-XXXXXXX-XXXXXXXX-XXXXXXX-differentiation/
Vasilaki, XXXXX; XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX .(XXXX). Apple Inc. Equity Valuation. (2019). XXXXXXXXX XXXX https://repository.ihu.XXX.gr/xmlui/bitstream/XXXXXX/11544/29354/m.vasilaki, g.tsakalidis_bf_12-04-XXXX.pdf?sequence1