Student Name:
Name of city commission: Ormond Beach City Commission
Location of city commission: City Hall Commission Chambers
Date of city commission meeting: January 21, 2020, 7.00pm.
Introduction
This essay will cover and analyse the proceedings of the Ormond Beach City Commission meeting on January 21, 2020. The essay will cover the agenda items of meeting, topics and relevant discussion of meeting, items voted on and vote outcomes, outcome of topics discussed, key highlights and community service items, analysis of meeting, assessment of steps/actions taken by the Ormond Beach City Commission, assessment of political ideologies of city commission members based on voting patterns, decision-making influence of individuals in the political minority, and end with an assessment of the majority vote and a stand on whether it was reasonable.
Agenda items of meeting
A summary of the agenda items of the the Ormond Beach City Commission meeting on January 21, 2020 were as follows: (Ormond Beach City Commission, 2020)
Resolution No. 2020-06: A resolution governing the dates and times of regular meetings of the city commission for May to September 2020Resolution No. 2020-07: A resolution governing the execution of a contract reXXXXX XX a XXXXXX related services XXXXXXXX. (J&XXX;A XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX)Resolution No. XXXX-08: A resolution authorizing the execution XX a contract renewal of a towing XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX. (Daytona XXXXXXX Services)XXXXXXXXXX No. 2020-09: X resolution authorizing the XXXXXXXXX XX a XXXXXXXX renewal XX a XXXXXX XXXXXXX services contract. (Universal XXXXXX)XXXXXXXXXX No. 2020-XX: X XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX the XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX and XXX continuation XX minor XXXXXX XXXXXXXX in Daytona BeachPublic XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX No. XXXX-XX: XX ordinance XX land use XX XXX comprehensive XXXXXXXXXX Hearing XX XXXXXXXXX No. 2019-44: XX ordinance XX the future land use, intergovernmental XXXXXXXXXXXX and transportation XXXXXXX XX the comprehensive XXXXPublic XXXXXXX XX Ordinance No. XXXX-01: XX XXXXXXXXX amending the XXXXXXXX zoning map, XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX of parcel of 3.11 acres at XXX South XXXX XXXX to XXXXXX a XXXXXXX business development zone.XXXXXX Hearing XX XXXXXXXXX No. 2020-XX: An XXXXXXXXX XXX a planned business development known XX ‘XXXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX Storage’XXXXXX Hearing on XXXXXXXXX No. XXXX-XX XXX XXXX-XX: XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX to clarify XXX city’s XXXXXXXXXX policies XXXXXXX XX utility connections XXXXXXX the XXXX’s municipal boundariesXXXXXXXXXX of the XXXX for XXX Holidays XXXXXX Award XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX East Central Florida XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX Action Plan XXX Resilience XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX of meeting
The meeting XXXXXXX a wide array of XXXXXX, which XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX, regional XXXXXXXXXX action plans, contract XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX XXX XXXXX minor league XXXXXXXX teams, land use issues, zoning, XXX approval XX climate controlled storage developments. (XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX Commission, XXXX)
XXXXX voted on and XXXX outcomes
All XXX above XXXXX were XXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX. (XXXXXX Beach XXXX XXXXXXXXXX, 2020)
XXXXXXX XX topics XXXXXXXXX and XXXXXX XX key XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX, XXX XXX XXXX XXXXXXX Florida Regional XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX Plan XXX Resilience XXXXXXXXXXXXX, the plan XXX XXXXXXXXX and reviewed, XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX noting XXXX resiliency XXX a highly discussed XXXXX, and suggestingto XXXXX the Commission to review XXX XXX in detail.
Secondly, for XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX, XX. Jim XXXXXXX of XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX XXXXXX support XXX XXXXXXXXXX of vacation XXXXXXX on XXXX XXX XXXXXX levels. XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX the dangers XX XXXXXXXX, disapproval of water fluoridation, XXXXXX XXXX conversion of property XXXX parking lots, and XXX process XX XXXXXXXXXX testing for XXX septic to sewer project.
XXXXXXX, for XXXXXXXXX No. XXXX-XX, the outcome XXX an XXXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXXXX, which was XXXXXXXX in XXXXXX by XXX four XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX the XXXXX.
XXXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXXXXX No. 2019-XX, the outcome XXX an approval of the XXXXXXXXX, which XXX approved in XXXXXX by the XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX and XXX Mayor.
Fifthly, XXX XXXXXXXXX No. 2020-XX, XXX XXXXXXX XXX an approval of XXX XXXXXXXXX, XXXXX was approved in XXXXXX XX XXX four commissioners and the Mayor. (XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX Commission, XXXX) Planning Director XXXXXX Spraker discussed XXX XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXX order XXXXXXXX, with queries made by XXX commissioners and the Mayor XXX the landscape buffer requirements, XXXXXXXXXXX building XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX between the XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXX property line. (XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX Commission, XXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX on his experience having attended the Planning XXXXX meeting, also XXXXXX that the building XXXXX be XXX least XXXXXXXXXX usage, XXXXX was supported by XXXXXXXXXXXX Selby. (Ormond Beach XXXX Commission, XXXX)
Sixthly, XXX Ordinance No. 2020-02, XXX XXXXXXX XXX an XXXXXXXX of the ordinance, which XXX approved in XXXXXX by the XXXX commissioners XXX XXX Mayor.
Next, for Ordinance No. 2020-XX, XXX outcome was an approval XX XXX ordinance, XXXXX was approved in XXXXXX by the four commissioners XXX XXX Mayor. XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX purpose of XXX request and that XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX help XX bring the XXXX’s XXXXXXXX in XXXXXX to XXXXXXX the XXXX’s XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX linked XX utility connections.
Finally, for Ordinance No. XXXX-XX, the XXXXXXX XXX an approval of XXX ordinance, which was XXXXXXXX in unison by the XXXX commissioners and XXX XXXXX. Enquiries were XXXX XX XXX Commissioners XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX XXX property, the request XXX a property XXXX, XXX XXX history of the XXXXXXXX.
Community service XXXXX
The XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX discussed included the septic XX XXXXX project, XXXXXXXXX events XXXX as XXX Ormond XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX XXXX, Arbor XXX XXXXX, Martin Lyther King Jr. Breakfast, XXXXXXXXX High XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXX Step Shelter, and XXXXXXX Service XXXX Master XXXX. (Ormond Beach City XXXXXXXXXX, 2020) XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX-XXXX rentals, which the XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXX XX meeting
XXX meeting contained a XXXXX variety XX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX, such XX community XXXXXX, rental policies, XXXXXX XXXXXXX services, land use, XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX, zoning policy, XXXXXXXXX issues XXX planned XXXXXXXX developments. The meeting revealed the XXXXXX Beach XXXX Commission as a XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX and cohesive political body, XXXXX effectively considered XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX and the issues XXXXXX XX citizens in making XXXXX decision. XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXX XX an XXXXXXXXX XXX bipartisan city commission XXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXX of XXXXX XXXXXXXXX into XXXXXXX. (Horowitz, 2017)
XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXX/actions taken by the XXXXXX Beach XXXX Commission
XXX steps taken by XXXXXX Beach City XXXXXXXXXX XXX reasonable, XX XXXX approved XXXXXX districts, land XXX amendments, and amendments to XXX city’s XXXXXXXXXXXXX Plan XXXXX a XXXXXXX consideration XX the XXXXXXX of the XXXX, XXX of the interests of constituents involved in it.
XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXX ideologies XX city commission members based XX voting XXXXXXXX
The XXXXXXXXX ideologies XX city XXXXXXXXXX members XXXX likely to be XXXXXXXXXX, based on their XXXXX of XXXXXX such as XXXXX-XXXX rentals, districting and XXXXXXXX, and XXX social XXXXXXXX XXXXXX by a climate controlled facility. XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX members XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX caused XX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX developments, XXX advocated for greater regulation as necessary in XXX XXXXX XX XXX rental market, XXXXXXXX XXX safety buffers XXX XXX climate XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX. XXX example, XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX noted that Ordinance No. 2020-XX, the XXXXXXXXX of the XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX policy in the city’s comprehensive XXXX, would help XX XXXXXXX XXX city from XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXX-XX-XXX-Sea XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXX. XXXX demonstrates a XXXXX concern XXX XXXXXXXXXXX interests XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX representatives.
Furthermore, it is worth XXXXXX XXXX XXX City XXXXXXXXXX could be leaning Democratic, XX they expressed XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX for a XXXXXX XX XXXXXX initiatives such XX the XXXXXX XXXXXX King XX. XXXXXXXXX, XXX First Step XXXXXXX, and XXXXXXXXX fundraisers.
However, it XX possible that XXXXXXXXXXXX Selby was a Republican, as he XXXXXX to XXXXX commercial XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX that XXX residential buffers XXX XXXXXXX generation XXXXX impact XXX constituents of XXXXXX Beach. XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX City Commission XXX been XXXXXXX previously XX favoring XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX over those of its XXXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXX-making XXXXXXXXX of individuals in the XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
There was no political XXXXXXXX in this meeting, XX XXX XXXX Commissioners XXX Mayor XXXXX in unison XXX XXX issues. XXXXXXX, several concerned XXXXXXXX XXX served as a minority voice for XXXXXX XXXX as testing XXX XXX septic XX sewer XXXXXXX and XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX.
Assessment of majority XXXX
The XXXXXXX was a highly XXXXXXX review of XXXXXXX procedural matters and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX affected Ormond XXXXX XXX its XXXXXXXXXXXX. XXX votes XXXX XX XXX XXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXXXX were XXXXXXXXXX, as XXXX XXXXXXXX a judicious XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX of XXX XXXXXXXXX involved. Hence, this XXXXX contends that supporting XXX majority vote XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX.
References
XXXXXXXXX, X. (XXXX).XXX city planning XXXXXXX: X political analysis. Cornell XXXXXXXXXX Press.
Horowitz, I. (2017).XXXX XXXXXXXX and planning. Routledge.
XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX: XXXX Commission XXXXXXX, Minutes &XXX; Meeting XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXX fromhttps://www.ormondbeach.org/122/XXXXXXX-Minutes-XXXXXXX-Recordings
XXXXXXXXX XX 2020-XX-21 XXXX XX XXXXXX Beach City XXXXXXXXXX Meeting. XXXXXXXXX fromXXXXX://www.youtube.XXX/XXXXX?v=DDOC5ky8-XX
Minutes XXX XXXXXX XXXXX City Commission, January 21, 2020. XXXXXXXXX fromXXXXX://XXX.XXXXXXXXXXX.XXX/ArchiveCenter/XXXXXXXX/XXXX/XXXX
XXXXXX XXXXXX for City of XXXXXX Beach, XXXXXXX XXXX Commission XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX 21, XXXX. Retrieved XXXXhttps://www.XXXXXXXXXXX.XXX/ArchiveCenter/XXXXXXXX/Item/XXXX
">