State as a Neutral Body between Employers and Workers
Name
Institution Affiliation:
The state as a Neutral Body between Employers and Workers
The state provides laws that guide the employer-employee relationship that seeks to protect essential society values such as freedom for solidarity, collective bargaining, and many more. The state holds principles such as measures to inspire and boost the development and application of machinery for stable negotiations between the two sides wholly. In most cases, the state has place adequate structures that result in equilibrium in the powers, privileges, and rights between the two sides. The paper will focus on analyzing whether the state is the neutral party in the relations with employers and workers based on Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Emile Durkheim's thesis.
Karl Marx and the Capitalism Thesis
The main ideas of Karl Marx on capitalism are XXX XXXXXXXXXX XX how it XXX XXXXX instead XX how it XX defined. He XXXXXX XXX perception of XXXXXX back into XXXXX natural XXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX individuals and XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXX XX XXX people that have been reconstructed by XXXXX activities, XXXXXXXXXX in the line of industrialization. XXXXXXXXX XX XXXX XXXX, how XXXXXXX XXXX their XXXXXX interferes XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXX, and XXXXX everyday operations. Karl XXXX XXXXXXXX a XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX of how it XXXXXXX in a capitalistic society XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX (Godard, 2005). XX the core XX the XXXXXX, XXXX XXXX asserts XXXX XXXXXXX are alienated from the main production XXXXXXX since XXXX are XXX an integral part of XXXXXXXX what and how it XXXXXX XX done. XXXXXXXX, in the capitalists’ society, someone will XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX and pace XX XXXX as well XX whoever is allowed in the XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX XX a hiring XXX XXXXXX basis. XXXX, in the capitalists’ XXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXX is alienated XXXX XXX XXXXXXX he/XXX participates in producing XXXX that XX interest in XXXX happens to it on XXX XXXXX it XX not XXXXXX XXX XXXXXX. XXXX, XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXX other XXXXXX XXXXX the XXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXX XX production XXXXXXXX their XXXXXXX of XXX XXXXXX XX champion XXXXX selfish interests, such XX expanding the XXXXXXX margin. XX means XXX workers under the XXXXX are XXXXXXXX from creativity in XXXX a XXXXXX that it befits XXX XXXXXX human XXXXX. The XXXXXX XX production XXXXXXX XXXXXX XX XXXXX own instead XX an individual XXXXX XXX legal XXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXX. XX XXX capitalist society, XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX the XXXXXXX XX their XXXXXXXX, whom they XXX control for their own benefits (Gall, XXXX). XX XXXXXXX XXXX the XXXXX is not able to XXXXXXX labor XXXXXXXXXX in the XXXXXXXXXXX’ society, given that laborers XXXX XXXXX labor, not themselves. It XXXXXXX that labor refrains XXXX activity, product, XXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX, a XXXXXX that hinders them XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX them into better human XXXXXX XX the same XXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXX.
XXXXX XX Karl Max XXX XXXXXXXXXX's XXXXXX, it XXXXX that the XXXXX is XXXXX a XXXXXXX body in XXX relations between employers and workers. As a neutral body, it should have XXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX worker from XXXXXXXXXXXX XX other owners XX factors XX XXXXXXXXXX (XXXXXX, XXXX). XXX state should be in XXX first line XX promote XXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX, but XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX the capitalist structure, it has lost XX neutrality taste. Capitalism promotes social ills that abuse human XXXXXX indicating XXXX the state XXX lost its XXXXXXXXXX spirit to XXXXX XXX XXXXX XX thrive. XXXXXX XXXX XXX right XX make XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XX their lives, which XXXXXXXX to their well-being. Secondly, it is XXXXXXXXXX to XXXXXXXX XXXXX from XXX XXXXXXX, a XXXX the XXXXXXX of production largely ignore that. XXXX tend to XXXX labor as their own XXXXX can XXXXXXXXX XXXX aspects of how it XXX XX XXXX, XXXX XX XXXX XXX how it should XX done. It means that XXX states XXXX to XXXXX XXX employers XXXX than the employees XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXX is the owners XX production misuse XXXXX XXX the selfish XXXXX despite regulations XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX how they XXXXXX bargain. However, the owner XX XXX production XXX the right to XXXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXX or reject, XXXXX XXXXX them XXXX power over the XXXXXXXX.
According to Karl Marx XXX the capitalists’ thesis, the XXXXX would appear XXXX XXXXXXX between the XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX by exerting XXXXXXX in all XXXXXXX of production (Godard, XXXX). XX pointed out XX Karl Marx separating the two sides into half, XXX XXXX notice that XXX side XX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, mentally XXXXXXXX, isolated XX XXXX as virtually powerless. XXX XXXXX is the XXXX XXXX employers XXX XXXXXXXX defined by increased bonds with other XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, XXX lost in XXXXX with an essential XXXX of the production XXXX is XXX XXXXXX. XXX XXXXXXX XXXX XX the XXXXXXX will undergo various forms XXX XXXX in the XXXXX procedure up to XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXX as XXXXXXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXXXXX, wage, XXXX, XXX the rest. XXXXXXX, in XXX XXXX of the state, it XX not XXX XXXX. XXXXXXX, it XX XXXXX on the XXX of XXXX that interprets the XXXXXXXX XXXXX on their XXXXXXXXXXXX with other people. The state has compelled the worker to be XXX victim XX alienation from the product XX allowing XXXXXXX XXX XXXXX power XXXXXX him out of touch XXXX XXX product (Befort & Budd, XXXX). It XXXXXXXX XXXX the only way XXX XXXXX can act neutral is XX assuming XXXXXXXXX of all XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX for XXX worker to take XXXXX XXX recognition of XXX final product.
Emile XXXXXXXX and XXX Industrialism XXXXXX
According to Durkheim, markets, and XXXXXXXX XX XXXXX do require XXX only a XXXXX XX XXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXXXX guarantees, XXX XXXXX but also an XXXXXXXXX of a XXXXX XXXXXXX (Godard, 2005). He XXXXXXX on the need XXX slim utilitarianism XXX its subsequent XXXXXX XX XXXX as XXXXX poverty. However, it XX XXXX explanatory that XXX the social life would be XXXXX in the absence of XXXXXXXXX that XXX XXXXXXXX XX that of XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX. XX implies XXXX XXX XXXXXXX of the collective XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XX norms of the XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, XX XXXX XX egoism, can XXXXXX XX whatever is XXXXXXXXXX social. XX XXXXX words, Durkheim is indicating that XX rules can XXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX of the individuals in which it is XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX basic XXXXXX. XXX primary XXXX XX XXX collective XXXXXXXXXX is that XXX community comprises of XXX XXXXXX XXXX XXX ‘cohere’ XXXXXXX they XXXX XXXXXXX values XXX regulations, which are imparted primarily XX XXX institution. The values and rules XXX either transcending or immanent in XXXX, which possess its XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX of integration that is XXXXXXX XX a certain XXXXXX as well XX recognition XX XXX rules that XXXXX personal character (Godard, 2005). XX is manifested in XXX whole phenomena that XXXXX with XXX mental XXXXXXXXXX of XXX collective representations at the institutional level. Also, it is XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX material substrate in terms XX population XXXXXXXXXXXX, interactions, XXX physical properties. The XXXXXXX XXX Durkheim applying the picture of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX is do shape the presence of XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX in XXXX XXXXX of social orientation. XX is a XXX of clarifying XXX two XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX representation levels XX well as XXXXXXXXXX policies XXXX XX formed XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX law. It XX well incorporates XXX formalized policies XXXX XX XXXXX & XXXXXXX, which are dual XXX relations of the casualty that is substrate-institutions-representations XXX XXX XX another XXX round.
Based on XXXXX XXXXXXXX, XXX XXXXX might XX neutral XX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXX might fail to XXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXXX (Godard, 2005). The XXXX of XXX state XX setting the rules XXXX will govern the XXXXXXXXXXXX between the XXX parties, but XXX XXXXXXX is that it will XXXXXX XXXX XXX will XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XX loyal XX XXX XXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXXXX approach adopted XX Durkheim is aimed XX checking XX the XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXX change. XX is XXXXXXXXXX this way XXXXX the XXXXXXXX collective XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX ability XX XX transformed into XXX institutions in the condition XXXX they XXXXXXX to XXX emerging XXXXXX gaps. It XX in a delicate XXXXXXXX, given that XXX push for XXXXXX and XXXX XX rebellion XXXX to be XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXX and XXXXXX division of XXXXX, it suggests that contemporary society will call XXX XXXX attention XX XXX individual XXXXXX. It is possible XX give XXXXX to personal XXXXXXXXXX that give XXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX protecting human XXXXXX. According XX XXXXX, XXX system is applicable XX XXXXXXX pedagogical XXXXXXXXXXXXXX in formalized or substrate levels. The XXXXXXXXXXXXX, in XXXX cases, directly conform to a XXXXXX XXXXXXXX system XXXX possesses relative XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX related to XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX needs. It means XXXX the XXXXX XXXX XX a neutral XXXXX in the XXXXXXXXX between XXX XXXXXXXXX XXX workers XXX XXXXXXX on available XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX for human rights (XXXX &XXX; XXXXX, XXXX). The response XX XXXXXXX XX very XXXXXXX as it XXX shape the XXXXX into XXXXXX in XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXX has to empower XXX people XX XXXX XX with a XXXXXXX of ideas XXXX XXXXX champion XXXXXXX rights that are touching XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX between employers XXX XXXXXXX. XX means that XXX XXXXX XXX XX XXXXXXX or XXXXX depending XX individual XXXX XX XXX population.
Own Perspectives
Based on XX XXXXX, XXXXX XX a XXXXXX to adhere XX a specific XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX is linked XXXX specific XXXXXXXXXX enhanced XX initial XXXXXXXXXXXXX. It XX XXX XXXX XXXX in what XXXXXX (XXXX) XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX psychology XXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX on professional work. In his XXXXXXXXXXX to the XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXX discloses the XXXXXXX XXXXXX of XXXX. Godard (XXXX) argues XXXX people XXXX have been XXXXXXXXX XXXXX in XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX have full XXXXXXXXXX to the XXXX of labor that offers the XXXX appropriate XXXXXXXXXXX for XXXXXX in the comprehension of the vocation. It is evident in the XXXXXX in which it XXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXXXX of XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX orientation XX the XXXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX class popularly XXXXXX XX the bourgeoisie. This central holding of the XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX is the most reasonable XXXX of XXXX yield industrial XXXXXXXXXX. In XXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXX of the XXXXXXX sprout XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, Godard (XXXX) fails to XXXXXXXX XXX factor of XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX but XXXX XX inquire XXXXX the source XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX that are XXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXX on the XXXXXXXXXXX, the state is neutral in the relations XXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX to exercise XXXXX beliefs in matters of labor XXXXXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXX, societies vary in XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX labor, XXXXX some XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX that spur the expansion of XXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX the creation XX ethical XXXXXXXXXXXXX of XXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX as XXX XXX XXXX in XXX XXXXXXXXXX ethic, it XXXXXX XX XXXXX of prolific XXXXXX Martin XXXXXX in XXX reform crusade. XX provides XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XX professional vocational and the equality of XXX XXXXXXX in XXX eyes XX XXX XXXXXXX XXX. It XXXXX XXX neutrality XX the XXXXX in XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX employers and employees. XXX XXXXX considered the XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX freedom and XXXXXXX seriously; XXXXX people are given XXX right XX XXXXXX their XXXXXXX in XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX on the division XX labor. XXX XXXXX mandate is only to ensure that the XXXXXXXXXX XXX carried XXXXXX the XXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX. People adhere XX XXX beliefs; hence XXX XXXXX has XX XX neutral as a way of XXXXXX the population their XXXXX rights, which is practicing their beliefs.
XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XXXXX provides XXXX XXXX guide the XXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX that seeks XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX society values XXXX XX freedom for solidarity, XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, and XXXX more. Also, the XXXXX XXXXX principles such XX measures XX XXXXXXX and boost XXX development and XXXXXXXXXXX XX machinery XXX stable negotiations XXXXXXX XXX XXX sides wholly. Lastly, XXX XXXXX has place XXXXXXXX structures that XXXXXX in equilibrium in XXX powers, XXXXXXXXXX, and XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX.
References
Befort, S. X., & XXXX, X. W. (2009).XXXXXXXXX XXXXX, invisible objectives: Bringing workplace
law and public XXXXXX into XXXXX.Stanford XXXXXXXXXX Press.
Budd, X. X., & XXXXX, X. (2008).Values, XXXXXXXXXX, and XXXXXX of reference in industrial
XXXXXXXXX.XXX Sage Handbook XX Industrial Relations. London: Sage, XX-XXX.
XXXX, G. (2003).XXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXX relations. Understanding XXXX XXX Employment:
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXX: Oxford XXXXXXXXXX Press. Marxist Thought XXX
XXX XXXXXXXX of XXXX.
XXXXXX, X. (2005). XXXXXXXXXX relations, XXX economy, and society. XXXXXXX: Captus Press.