Preview 50% of the Answer Below
Answer Preview
Detail the components of state bureaucracy and the issues surrounding representativeness and responsiveness.
Your response should be at least 200 words in length.
State bureaucracies are defined as a former hierarchy of government in the state comprising leaders, managers, executives and clerical staff. State bureaucracies typically come with a set hierarchy, policies and guidelines which members of the bureaucracy have to adhere to, as well as defined responsibilities for managing difference aspects of government, such as financing, education and regulation. Bureaucracies are also typically governed by formal rules and are comprised of multiple specialised departments, each of which takes charge of a specific domain of policy, such as the treasury, justice, agriculture, commerce, labor, energy, education, transportation, housing and urban development, and defence sectors. There are several issues linked to state bureaucracies, such as inefficiency, unrepresentativeness and poor responsiveness. Foremost, state bureaucracies are well known for being inefficient and poor in responding to the needs of their constituents. Frequently, state bureaucracies may be divorced from the needs and concerns of their constituents on the ground, and may not be able to accurately translate constituent concerns into practical policy actions. Secondly, state bureaucracies are often criticised for being poor in representation. State bureaucracies are frequently considered poor performers when it comes to diverse representation in terms of gender, ethnicity and sexual orientation. (Thielemann and Stewart, 1996) This is problematic, XXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXXX is typically tasked with XXXXXXXXXXXX policies that are meant to safeguard the XXXXXXXXX XX a XXXXX range XX social segments. XXXXXXX, a XXX-XXXXXXXXXXXXXX bureaucracy XXX XXXX to XX so. In addition, the XXXXX bureaucracy is often XXXX as a functional XXXXX XXXXX does not XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX or XXXXX constituent needs. XXX XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX agencies XXXX been accused XX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX in order XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX own mandates, XXXXXXXXX and funding. (XXXXXX, XXXX) Clearly, XXXXX bureaucracies XXXXXXXX XX be XXXXXXXXXXX, and more needs to XX XXXX to XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX to XX more XXXXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXX, S. (2013). XXXX XXXXXX matter? XXX effect XX XXXXXX representation of public XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXX performance.XXX XXXXXXXX Review of XXXXXX Administration,43(X), 221-242.
Selden, S. C. (XXXX).XXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXXXXX in a XXXXXXXXXX agency. Routledge.
XXXXXXXXXX, G. S., & Stewart XX, J. (XXXX). X XXXXXX-XXXX perspective XX the XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX: XXXX, XXXXXXXXX, gender, and sexual XXXXXXXXXXX.Public XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Review, 168-XXX.
XXXXXXXX 2:
Explain in XXXX ways XXXXXX XXXXXX, privatize, and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, and XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX that XXX occur XX a XXXXXX of XXXXX XXXXXXX in metropolitan areas.
Your XXXXXXXX should XX XX XXXXX XXX XXXXX in XXXXXX.
States XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX and reinvent government in a XXXXXX of ways, and this XXX create a host XX XXXXXXXXXX problems as a result XX XXXXX XXXXXXX in metropolitan XXXXX. Foremost, technologies XXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX intelligence, surveillance cameras XXX chatbots have XXXXXXX states to XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XX collecting XXXX on XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXX such XXXX XX deliver more XXXXXXXXXX and on-XXXXXX forms XX government XXXXXXXX XX their constituents. (McNutt et XX, 2018) XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX have XXXX XXXXX governments the tools to start XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX labs in order to create more XXXXXXXXX and effective ways XX engage the general XXXXXX. Secondly, governments have XXXXXXXXXXXX privatised XXXXXX services XXXX XX prisons, XXXXXXXXXX XXX education XX private XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX as companies. XXX example, charter XXXXXXX XXXX XXXX a XXX XXXX of XXXXXXXXXX state XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, while XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX prison services and XXXXXXXX to private companies has XXX XX XXX rise XX XXX so-XXXXXX 'XXXXXX industrial complex', with XXXXX companies XXXXXXXX for an XXXXXXXXX of the XXXXXXX XXXXXX system XX maintain their corporate XXXXXXX. XXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXX have XXXXXX XX reform the system by cleaning XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX laws, XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX ensuring XXXX representatives XXXX accountable to their XXXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX had a XXXXXX of XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. Foremost, XXX implementation XX XXX technologies such as XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX to a loss XX XXXXXXX for constituents. (Slobogin, XXXX) Secondly, XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX public XXXXXXXX XXXX as XXXXXXXXXX and education XXX led XX lower XXXXXX segments of the XXXXXXXXXX being XXXXXX out of affording XXXX essential services. (Madumo XXX XXXX, XXXX) For example, Boustan XX XX (2013) XXXXX how rising income inequality was XXXXXXXX in XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX schools. (Boustan XX al, XXXX) XXXXXXX, privatisation XX the prisons system XXX XXXX to XXX XXXXX of XXXXXXXXX XXX poor living conditions XXX prisons. Finally, XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX government functions XXX XXXXX XXX democratic rights of citizens, as the corporations in XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX XXX be XXXX accountable. (Verkuil, XXXX)
Boustan, X., Ferreira, F., Winkler, H., & XXXX, X. M. (XXXX). XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX on XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX expenditures: XXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXX districts, XXXX–XXXX.Review XX Economics and XXXXXXXXXX,XX(X), 1291-XXXX.
David, N., XXXXXX, J. X., & XXXXXXX, J. X. (XXXX). Smart cities, XXXXXXXXXXXX, civic XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX government. XXXXXXX Technologies XXX Smart XXXXXXXXXXX(pp. XX-XX). XXXXXXXX, Cham.
Madumo, O. S., & Koma, S. B. (XXXX). Local XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX in XXXXX XXXXXX: XXX Quest for XXXXXX XXX Repositioning XX Municipal XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX Economics,8, 581-590.
XXXXXXXX, X. (XXXX). Public privacy: XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXX places and XXX right XX XXXXXXXXX.XXXX. lJ,XX, 213.
XXXXX, X. H. (XXXX). Reinventing XXX XXXXXXXXXXX local government. XXXXXXXXXXXX and Change in Public XXXXXX Organizations(pp. XX-XX). Routledge.
Verkuil, P. R. (XXXX).XXXXXXXXXXX sovereignty: XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX we XXX XX about it. Cambridge University XXXXX.
QUESTION 3:
XXXXXX the major XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXX how XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX their leadership role XXX legislative relationship.
XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX at least 300 words in XXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXX, XXX are appointed public leaders in charge of towns, XXXXXXX and cities, typically XXXX a XXXXX and pivotal XXXX in XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX initiatives XXX guiding XXX legislature to implement XXXXX XXXX which XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX.
Foremost, governors are XXXXXXXXX involved in XXXXXXX or XXXXXXX bills passed XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XXXX XXXX up the role of the commander-in-chief of XXXXX XXXXX’s military. (XXXXXXXX, XXXX) These are XXXXXXXXXXXXXX duties XXXX most governors XXXXX XXXX to XXXXXXX.
>span class="s1"&XX;XXXXXXXX often plays a pivotal role in XXXXXXX the legislative direction for XXX XXXXX senate XXX House XX Representatives in areas such XX health care, education, and law XXXXXXXXXXX. (XXXXXXXX and XXXX, 2002) XXXXXXXXXXX , the governor has a XXXX vote which XXX XX XXXX to correct or stop the XXXXX of certain XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX if XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXX XXX in the XXXXXXXX XX the state. XXXX allows XXX XXXXXXXX XX play a XXXXXXXXX range of XXXXX in XXX legislative XXXXXXX.
XXXX XXXXXXXXX have served XX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX such as state senators, XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXX representatives XX push through significant XXXXXXXXXXX reform, while XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX known for XXXXXXX specific factional interests and XXXXXXXXXXX their needs above others. XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXX governors such as Arnold XXXXXXXXXXXXXX could also be very XXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXXX public support XXX XXXXXXXX policy initiatives, as XXXX XXXX seen XX public leaders who were able XX XXX widespread support in order XX push XXXXXXX important XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXX.(XXXXXXXX and XXXXX, XXXX)
Governors XXX XXXX be XXXXXXXX to set XXX broad XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX, XXX mediate XXXXXXX several XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX to XXXX XX a XXXXXXXXXXX consensus. XXXXXXX, governors have XXX power to build coalitions and persuade lawmakers XXX constituents of XXX necessity of a XXXXXXX legislative XXXXXXXXXX, given that the governor XX XXXXXXX XXXX a high public XXXXXX that XXX be used to XXXXX XXXXXX in public.
In XXXXXXXXXX, governors XXXX a decisive role in XXXXXXX the legislative XXXXXXX, and their XXXXXXXXXXXXX can XX a XXXXX determinant of the XXXXXXX of a XXXXXXXXXXX initiative.
References
Ferguson, M. R., & XXXXX, X. (XXXX). XXXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXXXXXXX arena: The XXXXXXXXXX XX personality in shaping XXXXXXX.Political XXXXXXXXXX,23(4), XXX-XXX.
XXXXXXXX, M. R. (2003). Chief XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX in the XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX.State XXXXXXXX & Policy XXXXXXXXX,X(X), XXX-182.
Jong, W., XXXXXXX, X. L., & XXX der XXXXXX, P. X. (2016). XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX during crises: a systematic review XX XXXXX and effectiveness.XXXXXXX XX Contingencies XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX,24(X), 46-58.
XXXXXX, J. R. (XXXX). The impact of divided XXXXXXXXXX XX legislative production.XXXXXX XXXXXX,XXX(1-2), 217-233.
">