Article XXXXXX
Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXX Affiliation
XXX’s XXX the Homeless People XXXXXXXXXX
XXX XX XXX XXXXXXXX ways XXXX can XX employed in XXXXXXXXXX XXX effectiveness of XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXXXXX of needs assessment research. The findings derived from XXXX kind XX research XXX aid in XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXXX still remain XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXX study, XXX’s XXX the homeless XXXXXX themselves involved 301 homeless adults originating from XXXXXXX, XXX XXXX. XXX probability sample XXX XXXXXXXX over a XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXX the XXX XX documenting various factors, including the utilization of various XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX desired XXXXXXXX. XXXXX XXXX that, the XXXXX aimed at identifying factors that XXX XXXXXX with service preference, XXXXXXXXXXX as XXXX as satisfaction.
XXX XXXXXXX elaborates on the XXXXXXX as to XXX XXX services XXXX been poorly comprehended and under-XXXXXXXX. XXXXX some of XXXXX XXXXXXX include XXX proposal XX researchers that it XXXXX XX XXXXXXX of the fragmented care XXXXXX. XX XXX XXXXX hand, some individuals XXXX XXXXXX that XXXXX XXXXXX a XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX the XXXX XX XXXXXXXX desired by the XXXXXXXX and XXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXX that are XXXXXXXXXXXXX offered XX communities (XXXXXX & Toro, 2000). XXXXXX have XXXXXXXX service XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX the assessment of systemic XXXXX XXX have rather XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XX the homeless XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XX what XXXX instinctively XXXXXXX XXXX XXX basic XXXXX XX XXXX kind XX population.
The XXXXXXXX need assessment studies conducted on this kind of population XXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX. Among some XX XXXXX limitations XXXXXXX limited information collected, XXXX respondents have XXXX XXXXXX by researchers XX XXX XXX yes-or-XX format while some XXXX XXXXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXX items relative XX XXXX XXXXX (Acosta &XXX; Toro, 2000). XXXXX XXXX that, some researchers ignored XX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXX employed or XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX. Moreover, the XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXX the XXXXXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXX XXX the needs XX homeless persons. Based XX a XXXXXXXXXXX sample of XXXXXXXX adults, XXX current XXXXX XXX able to conduct a thorough XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX.
Apart XXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX above, XXX XXXXX also XXXXXXXXXXXXX evaluated the XXXXXXXXXX XX various factors in perceiving XXX significance XX XXXXX, predicting XXXXXXX XXX, XXXXXXXXXX in addressing XXX XXXXX XX XXXX XX contentment with services (XXXXXX & XXX, XXXX). A broad ecological XXXXXXXXXXX was XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXX XX these XXXXXXXX XXX encompassed XXXXXXX in XXXXX major domains, XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX environmental XXXXXXXXX, attributed that XXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXXXX adolescence and adulthood as XXXX as XXXXX demographics.
XXXXXX
X probability sampling technique XXX utilized in recruiting XXX respondents XXXX the baseline sample XXXXX drawn XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX a XX-month XXXXXX. Some of XXX requirements XX participation in the larger baseline XXXXXXXXX study demanded that at some point in the previous month, they were XXXXXX living in a shelter or on the streets or deliberated XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX living with either XXXXXX or XXXXXXX XXX not XXXXXX XXXX. XXXXX the dependent measures XXXX XXXXXXX XXXX the XXXXXX-up interview conducted in six XXXXXX, XXX XXXXXXXXX measures were from the baseline interviews.
XXXXXXXXX
XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XXXX XXXXX in number, XXXXXXXX XXX-encompassing training XXXX numerous XXXXX. XXX XXX XXXXXX-XX XXXXXXXXX, XXX respondents XXXX XXXX $XX or more, while $20 was paid XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. For the three XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX overseen XX XXX follow-up XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX of interrater XXXXXXXXXXX XXX conducted. Out of the 301 XXXXXXXXXX, only two interviewers XXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX in 31 of XXX XXXXXXXXXX (XXXXXX & Toro, 2000). Computation of the XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XX all items XX the XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX the two XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX employed in XXX assessment of reliability. Furthermore, cases XXXX paired in XXX XX reliability cases, XXX XXX every reliability interview, XXXXX XXX a XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX interviewer.
XXXXXXX
XXXX of XXX needs XXXX XXXX XXXXX as being XX least XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX as XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX need XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, education, XXX placement/XXXXXXXX, XXXXXX as XXXX XX XXXXXXX/XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX. XXXXX XXXX that, XXXX XX the XXXXX that were rated XX being relatively insignificant XXX XXXX XX obtain include substance XXXXX XXX mental health services. Several variables scrutinized in multivariate analyses XXXXXXXXX consistent correlations XXXX subsequent substance XXX, XXXXXXXXXXXX, and preference (Acosta &XXX; XXXX, XXXX). XX XXX XXXXX hand, XXXX contentment with XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX, less XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXX perceived needs XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX/ greater XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX was XXXXXXXX XXXXX persons with fewer XXXXXX XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX of color, younger adults, and those XXXXXX dependent children.
Sociological XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX the article, it is evident XXXX homelessness XX a XXXXXX problem that XX widespread XXXXXX the globe. The functionalism XXXXXXX XX showcased in the article, whereby XXXX agencies XXXX XXXX the XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX affordable housing. Also, the XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX has been employed in XXXX XXXXXXX XXX article; readers XXX able to learn XXX values XX well XX the XXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXX. Through XXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, the XXXXXXXX XXXXXX identify themselves XXXX a certain class in society. XX XX XXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX on XXXXXX, ethnicity, XXX class, a XXXXXX of XXXXXX different XXXXXXXX roles XXX XX XX incorporated.
XXXXXXXX
XXXXX XXX various XXXXXXX as to XXX I chose the article. The XXXXX reason is XXXX unlike XXX XXXXXXXX research XXXXXXXXX on the XXXX topic, it XXX few limitations, thus XXXXXX accuracies. XXX XXX XXXXX that interested XX XXXXX XXX article is its clear XXXXXXXXXXX of issues facing XXX homeless adults. XXXXX XXXX that, one thing I have XXXXXXX from it is XXXX most home XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX that what XXXXXXXX XXXXXX only XXXXXXX XX affordable XXXXXXX, XXXXX is not the XXXX.
Conclusion
XXXXX XX a XXXXXXXXXXX sample of XXXXXXXX adults, the XXXXXXX study was able to XXXXXXX a XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XX needs. XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXX the needs of XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX some XX the limitations of XXXX XXXXXXX XX XXX XXXX XXXXX. XXX study utilizes 301 XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXX up with XXXXXXX results by XXXXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXXX sampling technique. Among some XX the at XXXXX correspondingly XXXXX factors to XXXXXXXXXX housing XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, education, XXX XXX XXXXXXXXX/training. Moreover, the XXXXXXX has XXXXXXXX interactionism XXX functionalism XXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXX, X., & XXXX, X. X. (2000). XXX's ask XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX: X XXXXX assessment XXXXX on a probability sample XX XXXXXX. XXXXXXXX Journal of XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, XX(X), 343-366.