CASE STUDY OF GAS STATION
Student name:
Student ID:
Date:
Table of Contents
Introduction3
Scenario 1: Physical Hazard4
Scenario 2: Chemical Hazard4
Scenario 3: Natural Hazard5
Conclusion7
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXX management XX an XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX any organization. The risk management XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX a firm XX XXXX XXXX XXX issues. The XXXXX will highlight emergency response XXXXXXXXX XX a gas station. XXX XXXXXXXXX hazards in XXXX XXXXXXX are XXXXXXXX, environmental and chemical XXXXXXX. XXX paper XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX such scenarios XXX offer potential XXXXXXXXX with XXX implementation of GEBMO XXXX.
Scenario 1: Physical XXXXXX
The gas XXXXXXX, pump, XXX XXXXXXXXX can have XXXXXXXXXX issues, XXXXX XXX cause gas leak. As a consultant XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX of XXXX, XXX individual must offer XXXXXX contingency plan XXX XXX XXX station. The station has various XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, which are being XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX gas XXXX XXX 30000-gallon tank. Besides, trucks XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXX used XXX gas trade, which can create static discharge XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. The XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX GEBMO (General XXXXXXXX Model) tool to XXXXXXX these hazard XXXXXXXXX and offer a logical XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX administrative control. XXX employees XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX with XXXXXX during XXXX a hazard situation (Meilani, XXXXXXX &XXX; XXXXXXXX, 2018).
The initial problem is XXX maintenance issue, XXXXX XXXX XX monitored regularly. XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX properly XXXXXXX, XXX XXXXX bucket XXX be installed in these sections. Test XXXXXX be performed XXX XXXXXXX XXXXX XX days. Also, it XXXX be XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX XXXXX XXXX corrosion XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXX. The secon
d issue is static XXXXXXXXX XXX for XXXX, fuel vents must be kept XXXX.
Further, XXXX extinguishers XXX be XXXXXXX to prevent XXXXXXXXX. ESS (XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX) also XXX XX installed XX XXXXXXXXXX discharge risks. XXXXXXX, in case XX an accident, XXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXXX XX well as XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX so that XXX damage XXX XX XXXXXXX (Larsen XX al., 2017).
XXXXXXX, to XXXXXXXXX XXX these policies XXX guidelines, XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX be XXXXXXXX with HAZWOPER training. According to XXXX training program, the XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX ESS XXXXX XX XXXX fuel XXXXXXXX XXX XXXX all the vents to XXXXXXXX static discharge. Besides, XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX also XXX be used XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX.
Scenario 2: XXXXXXXX Hazard
XXXXX XXX XXXXXXX chemicals XXXX XXX available in XXX XXX station, XXXXX XXX XXXXX damage XX XXXXXX and XXX XXXXXXXXXXX (Smulders, XXXXXXXX & Rose, XXXX). Therefore, XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX needs XX XX XXXXXXX to secure XXXXX XXXXX. More XXXX XXX XXXXX of chemicals are XXXXXXX in XXXX an XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXX include lead, gasoline, XXX XXXXXXX. Petrochemical XXXXXXX can cause flammable XXXXXX XXX soil, XXX or XXXXX XXXXXXXXX. The consultants should XXXXXXX XXX employees to XXXX the XXXXX in a XXXX place. Otherwise, skin XXX be annihilated or burned due to XXXXXXXX to XXX XXXXXXXX. Primary XXXX is XX handle XXX store XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXX tool XXX be applied to analyze XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX offer XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX.
Therefore, protective dresses should XX available for XXX employees so XXXX they XXX control XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX. Besides, the nearby XXXXXXXX XXXX must be XXXXXXXXX in XXXX. XXX employees should XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX avoid exposure XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXX station. The XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX must XX XXXXXXXXXX with XXXX. Shield and XXXXXX aprons can XX used to XXXXXX chemical XXXXXXXXXX.
XX XXX XXXXX hand, XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX be used to circulate XXXXXXXXX chemical or gases to XXXXXXX storage. XXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX must XX XXXXXXXXX to reduce XXX impact (XXXXX, XXXX). The gas XXXX is XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX to tackle such XXXXXXXXX. Without a XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX, the XXXXXXXXX can die and the XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX face consequences.
HAZWOPER training can XX XXXXXXX to deploy XXXXXXXXX practices. The XXX XX ventilation XXXXXXX during chemical hazard XXXXXX be trained. XXXXXXX, XXX use XX oxygen masks XXX other XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX also XXXXXXXX in XXX program.
Scenario X: XXXXXXX XXXXXX
Natural XXXXXXXXXX XXX occur XXXX XXX storm, XXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX, and hurricane XXXXX can XXXX catastrophic damage on gas lines XXX station XXXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXX-gallon XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX taker of XXXXX-gallon XXXX be XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX. The XXXXX consultant XXX GEBMO XXXX can XXXX a vital XXXX in XXXXXXXX these XXXXXX properly. Besides, a logical XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXX plan should also be established XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX this tool.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX can be developed with digital XXXXXXXXXXXX and period XXXXXXXXXXX session. XXX crack in XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX should be XXXXXXX so XXXX XXXXXXXXX maintenance XXX be done in time. XXXXXXX, disaster management XXXXXXXX XXXX can be documented and educated to workers for emergency XXXXXXX (XXXXXXX & XXXXXXX, XXXX).
XXX XXXXXXXXX response includes XXXXXXXXX XXX nearby XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX so that XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX can XX XXXX if XXX XXX XXXXXX occurs due XX natural XXXXXXXXX. XXX alarming XXXXXX can XXXX XX XXXXXXXX XXX alerting the employees. XXXXXXX, XX any damage XXXXXX in the XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX hazard, immediate XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX be XXXX so XXXX XXXXXXXX of XXX XXX XXXXXXXXX can be XXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX regarding XXXXXXXXXXXXX hazard includes emergency evacuation XXXXXXXXX, and contingency plan (XXXXXXX XX XX., 2018). Besides, employees XXXXXX be instructed XX use XXX earthquake XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX, XXXXX will help to reduce ignition XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX the XXXXXXX. XXXXXXX, the XXXX department XXX XXXXXX should XX XXXXXXXX XX support XXXXXX evacuation XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX.
It is concluded that XXXXX XXXXX of hazards can occur in XXX gas XXXXXXX. XXXXXXX, GEBMO tool can XXXXX logical solutions XXX risk mitigation XXX effective maintenance of XXX (XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX). The XXXX helps to build an effective XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXX gas XXXXXXX. Further, it is recommended to XXXXXXX a digital XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX measure XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX. XXXX, XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX guidelines XXX XXXX to XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX.
Giordan, X., Hayakawa, Y., XXX, X., Remondino, X., & XXXXXXX, P. (XXXX). the XXX XX remotely XXXXXXX aircraft systems (XXXXX) XXX natural XXXXXXX monitoring and XXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXX hazards XXX XXXXX system XXXXXXXX, 18(4), 1079-1096.
Hyatt, N. (XXXX). Guidelines XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX (PHA, HAZOP), hazards identification, and XXXX analysis. XXX XXXXX.
XXXXXXX, D., &XXX; XXXXXXX, D. (XXXX). Natural hazards XXX XXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXX Learning.
XXXXXX, X. X. X., XXXXXXX, X., XXXXXX, N., Sørensen, C., &XXX; Christensen, F. B. (2017). XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX: XXXXXXX hazard risk XXXXXXXXX XXX management. In Sustain XXXX.
Meilani, X., XXXXXXX, X., & XXXXXXXX, X. K. S. X. (XXXX, May). Reducing the XXXX of XXXXXXXXX hazard in XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XX Mount Bromo. In IOP Conference XXXXXX: XXXXX and Environmental XXXXXXX (Vol. XXX, No. X, p. 012021). IOP XXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXX, F. X. X., Rietjens, I. M. C. X., &XXX; XXXX, X. (XXXX). Chemical hazards in XXXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXX: XXXXX XXXX safety assurance, XXXXXX X. XXXXXXXX hazards in XXXXX of animal origin: ECVPH XXXX safety assurance, volume 7.