Analyzing XXX Case XX Janet X. and Epilepsy
Student name
Course name
XXXXXXXXXX XXXX
Instructor name
Date:
XXXXXXX “The case of Janet X. and XXXXXXXX” (found in chapter 1) XXXXX XXX Three-step XXXXXX Model (Blanchard-Peale).
XXXXX XXXXXX evaluation of an XXXXXXX dilemma XXXX "XXX XXXX of XXXXX X. and Epilepsy", Kenneth Blanchard XXX Norman XXXXXXX XXXXX advised XX XXX the XXXXX-XXXX model. Following XXX XXX XXXXXXXXX that XXX XXXXXXXX to XX asked XXXX using three-step ethical XXXXX.
1) Is it XXXXX?
2) Is it balanced?
X) XXX does it make me feel?
X) Is it legal? In XXX ‘case of Janet X. and XXXXXXXX’ it XX XXXXXXXXX to decide whether XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX Janet is XXXXXXX? If XXX answer is XX then probably it XXX't a good idea. XXX point is XXXX it's unethical. XXXXX XXXXX caused XXX XXXXXXXXXX to the hospital XXXXXXXXX it is not XXXX XX terminate Janet. It XX XXXXXX XXXXXXX hospital XXXXXXX her job after XXXXXXX XXXXX her XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. Although, it is unfair, however it is legal to XXXXXXXXX her.
2) Is it XXXXXXXX? If it is legal then XXXX question XX XX ask; XXXXXXX XX it XXXXXXXX? XX XXXXX XXXX you in XXXXXXXXXXX if someone is negatively impacted XX a XXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXXX case XXX termination XX XXXXX XXX a XXXXX reason XXXX she will XXXX the XXXXXXX every month, this XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX, and XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX get affected. XXXXX, the action hurts XXX individual XXX so it is not balanced.
3) How does it make me XXXX? XX I XXX not feel right doing XXXXXXXXX I XX XXX XXXXX that I XXXXX do it. XX XX important XX note XXXX females XXXX to XX more emotional than XXXXX and it could affect a person emotionally XXX XXXXXXXXXX. XX Janet XXXX XXX XX XXXXXXXX because of her termination. XXX hospital can XXXX the name XX the XXXXXXXX XX terminating XXXXXX X. XXXXXXX, it XXXX XXXX Person X XXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXX, it XX XXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XX "the XXXX of XXXXX K. XXX Epilepsy" XXXXXXX XXX Three-XXXX XXXXXX Model, XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX is XXXXXXX.
Conclusion
In the given XXXX since, XXXXX’s XXXXXXXX would XXXXX a bad XXXXXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXXX; XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX in XXXXXX XXX administrator to XXXXXXXXX her. XXXXXXXX it XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX of XXXXXX X, the decision XXX XXXXXXX (XXXXXXX, 2016).
References
XXXXXXX, X. (XXXX). XXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXX. XXX XXXX, NY: XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX.