Promissory estoppels XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX. This is because it is derived XXXX XXXXXX. This XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX will XXX be able XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXX one XXXXX XXXXXXXX a XXXXXXXX. Thus XXX contract XXXX XXX XX XXXXXXXX or XXXX XX held XX suspense. This XXX applied in the XXXX of XXXXXXX London XXXXXXX limited XXXXXXX High XXXXX House Limited by XXXXXXX X. XX XXXXXXXX that under promissory XXXXXXXXX, a contracting party XXX promises not XX XXXXXXX a XXXXXXXXXXX right will XXX be able XX enforce XXXX contract XXXXX.
The XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX one XXXXX agrees not to XXXXXXX their XXXXXX under XXXXXXXX. For example, XXXXXXXXX delivery later XXXX XXXXXX as it was in XXX case XX XXXXXXX V. XXXXX (1875). A buyer XXXXX XXX seller to deliver XXXXX XXXXX XXXX agreed. When this happened XXX buyer XXXXXXX to accept the goods. XX then XXXX the XXXXXX for XXXXXXXXX the contract but XXX XXXX was XXXXXX down. This happened because he had made the vaguest XX which XXX XXXXXX accepted.
XXXX asked Fazul to fix his XXXXXX XXX XX be XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX. Fazul failed to complete XXX XXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX time but Alex, albeit being XXXXXXXX, decided XX XXXX her an extra two XXXXXX to do the XXXX XXXXXXX to which he would not accept XXX XXX XXX the XXXXXXXX cancelled, XXXX XXXXXXXX transpired and Fazul became angry and XXXXXXX to sue XXXX.
XXXXXXX Wakianga XX XXXXXXXX the XXXX opined that in the XXXXX XXXXXXXX, where an XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXX, it XXXXXXXX operated as a XXXXXX XXXXXXX that Alex will XX XXXXXX XXX bleach if he XXXXXXXX XXXXXX to XXXX XXX XX during the existence of XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, during the second XXXXXXXXX was XXX a waiver and XXXX Alex XXX well XXXXXX XXX XXXXX to terminate the contract XXX XX XXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX was in XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX and XXXX Alex was XXXXXX the XXX whilst XXXXXXXX XX accept the contract.