XXXXXXX
Underprivileged XXX taxpayers XXXXXX the most XX a result XX false claims, outright fraud, or error misappropriates XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX Assistance XXXXXXX (XXXX) XX a Federal-XXX XXXXXXX XXXXX provides XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX an XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX beneficiary XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX mostly XX children, the elderly, and the disabled. Participation in the program XXX previously been XXXXXXXX as a moderator between XXXX XXXXXXXXXX and depression. However XXXX is a XXXXXX troubled XXXXXXX. XX XXX XXXX significant XXXXXX of XXXXX and XXXXX XXXXX is XXXXXXXXXXXX evident XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX and organized XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX these XXXXXX assistance XXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXX- XXXX considering the growing XXXX and XXXXXXXXXXXX effectiveness, XXXX is an XXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXX-XXXXXX, XXX deeply XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX. Officially, XXX XX XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX (USDA) XXXX program XXXXX XX XXXXXX $858 XXXXXXX last year, which would XXXXXX to just a bit XXXX than one percent of SNAP XXXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXX, this XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX to XXXXXX XXXXX, XXXX XX trafficking in benefits, not XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX payments XX individuals who were XXX correctly XXXXXXXX for XXXXXXXXXXXXX or who received benefits more XXXX the amount to XXXXX they should XXXX been XXXXXXXX. Recently XXXXXXXXXX through SNAP misappropriation XXXXXX government-XXXXXX funds through a XXXXX number XX public-XXXXXXX programs, e.g., XXXX, XXXX (XXXXXXXXX Assistance XXX XXXXX Families) and XXXXXXXX; this makes SNAP one of XXX most XXXXXXXXXX abused non–health XXXX social XXXXXXX programs
XXXXXXXX-XXX XXXXXXXX Accuracy Clearinghouse (XXX) XX an innovative XXXXXXXX to XXXXXXXXXX SNAP fraud XXX abuse. XX is XXXXX XX XXX LexisNexis XXXX source XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXX Computing Cluster (XXXX) XXXXXXXXXX XXXX provides XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXX to XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX of SNAP applicants and XXXXXXXXXX and quickly determine if they are receiving benefits in another XXXXX. The NAC solution XX a “XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX” XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX program XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX current XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX the occurrence of XXXXXXXXXXX due to dual participation.
CONCLUSION - The XXX, certainly, XXXX not XXXXXXX all XXXXXXXXXXXXX benefits, but it XXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXX critical XXXXX of XXXXXXXXX participation. XX will also XXXXXXX XXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXX XXX legitimate XXXX XXXXXXXXXX and participants, XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX process XXX XXXXXXXXXX accuracy.
REFERENCES
X.S. XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXX, “XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXX in the Supplemental Nutrition XXXXXXXXXX Program: 2009–2011,” XXXX and Nutrition Service, August X, XXXX.
“XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX (NAC) XXXXXXXXXX: Pre-Pilot Phase Evaluation.” Public XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX. June XX, 2013.