From "A WOMAN SHOPPING by ANNE BOYER" help me answer the below question? What does this "A WOMAN SHOPPING" text suggest

• What does this "A WOMAN SHOPPING" text suggest about the ways that assumptions are woven into human experience?

• Help me to support the idea with reference to "A WOMAN SHOPPING by ANNE BOYER"

• Help me answer by prose form

• Help me find one or more of the prompting text provided in this examination to the topic and to some ideas and impressions

“A WOMAN SHOPPING by ANNE BOYER“

"I will soon writealong, sad book called A

Woman Shopping. It will be a book about 

what we are required todoand also a book

About what we are hated for doing. It will 

be a book about envy and a book about 

Barely visible things. This book would be a book

Also about the history of literature and literatures

Uses against women, also against literature and for 

It, also against shopping and for it. This flaneur is a  

Poet is an agent free of purses, but a women is not a 

Woman without the straps over her shoulder or a clutch In her hand.

The back of the book will only sat this: if a 

woman has no purses, we will imagine one for her."

These would be the chapters:

"On a woman shopping 

On men shopping, with and without women

On children with women as they shop 

On the barely moving lips of the calculating and poor

On attempting to open doors for the elderly and in 

The processes of this, touching your arm 

On the acquiring of arms in action movies

On Daniel Dafoe

On the time I saw a homeless man murdered for

Shoplifting

On whether it is better to want nothing or steal

Everything

On how many of my hours are gone now because I have had to shop"

"There would be more: lavish description of lavish

Description of the perverse or decadently feminized

Marketplace, some long sentence concerning the

Shipping and distribution of alterity, an entire chapter 

About Tender Buttons in which each sentence is 

Only a question. And from where did that mutton 

That roast beef, that carafe come.

But who would publish this book and who, also 

Would shop for it? And how could it be literature if

It is not coyly against literature but sincerely against 

It, as it is also against ourselves?"