Name
Lecturer
Course
Date
Introduction
International relations and politics involved between states have been a controversial matter with the question of how far one state’s involvement in another’s affairs is justifiable. The issue has always been the drive powerful states have to ensure their interests are met as was the case in “the cold war” with the two superpowers at the time pushing for their interest in specific countries (Mingst & Snyder, p.25). The negative impact this had on the affected nations informs the call for liberalism. With various amendments to laws and the establishment of international bodies aimed at championing the interest of all countries, more autonomy is assumed to be given to each state. However, with superpowers still evidently having a say in the affairs of developing countries, the question arises on just how far the world order today is liberal. This question is analyzed in this paper with a presentation of arguments on the answer provided.
Liberalism overview
The concept of liberalism is XXXXX XXXX the notion of XXXXXXXXX between XXXX XXXX XXX XXXXX and XXX degree of independence XXXXX to each to make XXXXX decisions XXX exercise XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX. XX international XXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX how countries relate XXXX each other and XXX autonomy given XX XXXX other. XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX liberalism XX XXXXX featured XX specific elements that differ from one another.
XXXXXXXXXX is therefore analyzed under pacifism XXX imperialism XXXX the XXXXXX prioritizing peacemaking XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX and XXX latter focusing XXXX on the XXXXXXXXX of nations through XXXXXXXXXXX (XXXXXX &XXX; Snyder, p.73). XXX middle XXXXXX for each XX these XXXXXXXX XX liberalism is XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX theory XXX forward by XXXX; XXXX approach considers international XXXXXXXXX as the XXXXXXXXXXX of all XXXXXXXXXXX “in the community XX XXXXXXX” (Mingst & Snyder, p.XXX).
XXX XXXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XX XXX three theoretical approaches therefore informs the existing relationships among XXXXXX XXXXX. In XXXXXX society, it XX XXXXXXXX that XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XX more dominant as XXXX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX would XXXX finding a XXXXXXX XXXXXX to stay at XXXXX and in XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX, XX to XXX (XXXXXX & XXXXXX, p.127). Liberalism creates a state XX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX ensures XXXX XXX negativity associated XXXX earlier XXXXXXX XXXXXX XX powerful XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX their power XX less developed XXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXX’s XXXXX order
The world order XXXXX XX by a large extent XXXXXXX. The XXXXXXXX XX liberalism in international XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX presence of XXXXXX consideration of XXXXXXXX at XXXX by different nations, the XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX bodies, and the XXXXXXX XX XXXXX politics (Mingst &XXX; XXXXXX, p.25). XXXXX characteristics XXX XXXXXXX in XXXX international relations today. XXX instance, XXXXXXX are XXXX considerate of the consequences XX war XXX seek XX enable XXXXXXXX relationships XXXXXXX each other while upholding peace XX XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX XXXXXX.
The formation XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX bodies whose XXXXXXXXXXXX is XXXXXXXXX XX XXXX XXXXXXXX and less XXXXXXXX nations is another XXXXXXXXX of the extent the current XXXXX order is liberal. XXX United XXXXXX for XXXXXXXX, XXXXX XX a XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX had that title XXX a long XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX importance of XXXXXXX with XXXXX XXXXXXX through international XXXXXX. The unity is also XXXXXXX amongst other XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX Japan and others that fall in the Atlantic XXXXXX (XXXXXX &XXX; XXXXXX, p.XX).
Since the XXXXXX XXXXX XXX, XXXXXXXXX seem XX have XXXXXXXX the importance XX peace XX, XXXXXXX XXX fact that there XXXX XXXX instances of a strain in XXXXXXXXX XXXXX’s relationships, none XXX XXXX quite XX XXX XXXXX XX XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX wars. What XXXXX XXXX possible is XXX XXXXXXXX XX liberal XXXXXXXX among nations and the XXXXXXXXXXX of the XXXXXXXXXX XX a liberal approach toward matters of diplomacy (Mingst & Snyder, p.77).
XXXXXXXXXX not only entails XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX countries XXX XXX respect XXXXXXXX XX individuals of a XXXXXXX by another. XX necessitates the involvement of human XXXXXXX in all considerations XXXX XXX decisions encountered in diplomacy. The world order XXXXX emphasizes the XXXXXXXXXX XX respecting XXX rights XX citizens of XXXXX country and recognizing XXXX XXXXXXXXXX of XXX country of XXXXXX, XXXX XXXXXXXXXX deserves XX XX XXXXXXX with XXXXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXX is a good XXXXXXX of liberalism in XXX world order today (Mingst &XXX; Snyder, p.106). XXXXXXXX cases XX XXXXX trafficking hinder XXX XXXX extent XX XXXXXXXXXX, XX a large extent, it XX evident that such XXXXXXX XXX significantly reduced in XXXXX’s XXXXX order.
This is further supported XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX bodies meant to XXXXXXX XXX interest XX each country. The XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX instance XXXXXXX liberalism XX XXXX XXXXXX as it XXXXXXX member XXXXXX to show respect for the sovereignty of XXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX signed XXX fair XXXXXXXXX of its XXXXXX. XXXXXXX XXXXXX to XXXXX rules XXXXXXXX in XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX bodies XXXXXXX of their XXXXXXXXX. Working XXXX XXXXX countries provides mutual benefits XXXX inform XXX choice XX XXXX XX pacifist liberalism XX XXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX than war (XXXXXX & XXXXXX, p.129). By choosing XXXXX international XXXXXX to be members of XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX are beneficial, the liberal order XX XXX XX each XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXX independent decision.
XXX XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX religion XX XXXXXXX evidence XX how far the XXXXXXXXXXXXX order has come XX being XXXXXXX. In XXXXXXX centuries, Christianity was imposed XX XXXXXXX by XXXXXXXXXXXX disregarding the XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX religion XX XXXX XXXXXX. XXXX nations and societies XXXX XXXXXX to take on XXX XXXXXXXX XX the colonialists disregarding their XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX their beliefs XXXXXXXXX XXXX religion XXXXX to them (XXXXXX &XXX; XXXXXX, p.110). However, XXXXX, XXXXXXX is XXXXX XX XXXX state’s XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX, and matters XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX concern XXX XXXXXXXXX carried out XX XXXXX instances XX XXXX XXXXXXX a specific religion.
Kant’s perspective XX liberalism considers a situation where all XXXXXXX relate in XXXXXXX XX a “XXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXX” (Mingst &XXX; XXXXXX, p.128). XXXX liberalism is XXXXXXXXX XXXX nations are able to XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX actions in XXX aid XX XXXXXX. XXXXXX away a country’s right to XXXXXX itself is different from XXXXXXXXX a helping XXXX in a XXX XXXXXXXXX. XXXXXX in XXX cold war XXXXX the legitimacy of the actions XX nations XXXXXXXX XXX questionable, the XXXXX order today provides the chance XX XXXXXX in XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX with no XXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX. XXXX is XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX like XXX UN (XXXXXX & Snyder, p.112).
The XXXXXXXXXXXXX order today XX XXXXXXXX XX all the XXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX. The XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX is XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX elements of all three forms of XXXXXXXXXX described earlier. XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX where XXXXXXX XXXX made XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX go to XXX to XXXXXXX its interest, XXXXXXXXX where XXX XXXXXX XX XXXXX seemed XXXX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX and a XXXX when the XXXX chosen was to maintain a XXXXXXX between the XXX (XXXXXX & XXXXXX, p.213). XXX common factor is that in all XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, XXX XXXX that the XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX was looked at XX a society is XXXXXXXXXXX.
Even in XXXXX XXXXX the most extreme actions XXX XXXXX by a XXXXXX XX XXXXX for their interest, XXXXXXXXXX XX still in practice. To XX XXXXXXX means being able to XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX decisions XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX best XXXXXXX or XX a XXXXXXXXXXX XX an XXXXXX XXXX on a XXXXXXX’s liberalism. In international XXXXXXXXX, cases XX terrorism XXXX been XXXXXXXXX claimed XX XX XXXXXX XX a XXXX at diplomacy. XXXXXXXXX puts the XXXXXXXX XXXXXX in an unfortunate situation XX motivate XXXX XX meet XXX XXXXXXX XX XXX attacker (XXXXXX & XXXXXX, p.XXX). Although this XXXXXXX XXX peace XXXX XXX XXXX fought for years in international relations, it XXXXXX to show XXXX XXXXXXXXX have XXXX a XXXX XXX to obtain XXXXXXX XXXXXX.
XX XXX XXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX is economic XXXXXXXXXX. Nations across XXX world XXXXXX in economic XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXX XXXXXXX XXX receive materials XXXXXX XXX not XXXXX within their country. XXXX knowledge XX how XXXXXXXXX this is, countries XXXXX necessary XXXXXXXX XX ensure a XXXXXXX diplomatic relationship XX established between them XXX their trade partners. Most XXXXXXXX of the political XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX’s today shows elements XX liberalism. These XXXXXXX harmonious relations with XXXXX XXXXXXXX, the XXXXXXXXXXX of both macro XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX factors in XXXXX, XXX XXXXXXXX placed on the XXXXXXX of the XXXXXXXXXXXXX community, and a XXXXXXX XXXXX of XXXXXXXXXXX despite the XXXXXXXX of XXXXXXX factors XX XXXX (XXXXXX & XXXXXX, XXX). All these XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX the liberal state achieved in the XXXXXXX XXXXX order.
XXXXXXXXXX
Liberalism in international relations XX a XXXXX characterized by XXXXXXXXX XX power XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXX amongst XXXXXXX, XXX the advancement XX mutual benefits XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XX XXX XXXXX of each country to XXXX liberal XXXXXXXXX. The current world order has to a large extent become liberal. XXXXXXXX XX earlier XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXX in other countries XX XXX expense of XXXXX, the XXXXXXXXX XX international XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX the rights XX XXXX nation XXX XXXXXXXXX and war avoided XX XXX costs (Mingst &XXX; XXXXXX, p.XX). XXX freedom XX choose XXXXXXXX XXX respect individuals XXXXXXXXXX XX their XXXXXX XXXX indicates the growth in XXXXXXXXXX. Lastly, the dominance of political economies XXXXXXXXXXXXX by harmony and the XXXXXXXXX of global welfare is XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX of XXX extent XX XXXXX the XXXXX order XXX become liberal.
Work XXXXX
Mingst Karen XXX Snyder JackXXXXXXXXX Readings in World XXXXXXXX. Routledge XXXX