Case Study Part 1
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
In the case XXXXX, XXXX XX a young XXXX XXXX XX XXXXX XXX carries the burden XX a heinous act XXXX was XXXX to her XXX XXXXX ago. The man XXX XXX XXXXXX sent her bus XXXX, XXX she XXXX all the XXX XXXX XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX to meet him. Unfortunately, XXX XXX XXXXXX out XX be XXXXXXX and XXXXX her XXXXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXX XXXXX is quite XXXXXXXXX because XXX XXX XXX a wife XXX XXXX XXXXXXXX who know him as the XXXX XXXXXX. Mary, who XX XXX XXXX character in XXX story, XXXXXXX feelings XX hate XXX is XXXXXXXXXXX. XXX’s XXXXXX fearful especially after XXXXXXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXX she XXX XXXX XXX XXX. The XXXXXX of the act makes separate herself from XXXXXXX and even her parents.
XX the XXXXX XXXX, XXX XXX XXXX she XXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX cool that he XXXXX get XXXX with the XXXXX issue XXXXXXX everyone is testifying XXXX he is a XXXX XXX. Mary’s XXXXXXX XXX quite XXXXXXXXX XXX feel XXXXXXX by XXX whole XXXXXXXXX XX missing their XXXXX and XXXX XXXXXXX out what had been XXXXXXXXX XX her for XXX whole XXXX XXX was away. The XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX church, and XXX XXX’s XXXXXX XXXXXX Michigan feel XXXX he has an outstanding XXXXXXXXX XXX cannot XXXXXX in XXXX an act.
XXX XXXXX and most XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XX confidentiality (Sanders et XX., XXXX) XXXXXXX, in this case, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXX XX law has XX XX XXXXXXXX because XXXXXXXX needs XX XX given to the jury. XXXXXXX, XXX therapist XXX XXXXX XX XXXX to the XXXX has XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX of XXX XXXXXX that she wants XXXX XX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX. XXX other ethical consideration XX honest XXXXX everything that XXXXXXXX and not goes by XXXXXX’s XXXX.
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX also XXXXX to XXXXX Mary XX make XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX the provision XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX or services XXXXXX. XXX XXXXXX in the XXXXXXXX justice field XXXXX XX assess XXXX the XXXXXXXX and XXXXXX information (Sunde, 2013). They are not XXXXXXX to irrelevant XXXXXXXXXXX because it XXXX not be XXXXXXXX anywhere in XXX XXXXX court process.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, in this case, XXXXX a XXXXXXXXXXX role. XXX of the XXXXX issues XXXX it XXXXX in making XXXX XXXX Mary XXXXX safe is XX XXXXXXX before XXX jury. XXXXXXXX, it may make her feel comfortable XX share XXX XXXXXXXXXXX with a counselor. However, at XXX moment, XXX does XXX feel XXXX because XXX feels XXXX everyone XXXXX XXXX happened to her; XXXX’s XXX XXX wants to XXXXX her parents XXX friends.
XXXXXX the jury, XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX be compromised XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX need to XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX the XXX. XXXX, confidentiality plays a XXXX in XXXXXX XXX XXXXXX testifying to XX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX giving XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXXXX, confidentiality XXXXX it XXXX XXX XXX arresting XXXXXXXX XX testify XXXXX on XXX results they got XXXXXX XXX investigation.
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXX, X., Young, R., &XXX; XXXXXX, M. (2019).Criminal XXXXXXX. , : Oxford University XXXXX.
XXXXX, X. Ã. (2013). XXXXXXX: Crime and XXXXXXXXXX in XXXX and XXXXX â XXXXXXXXXXXX.Bergen Journal of XXXXXXXX Law and Crim
XXXX Justice,1(X), 78-79. doi:XX.XXXXX/bjclcj.XXXX.535