If a religious entity would have to pay XXXXX like a profit-XXXXXXXX organization, XXXXX XXXXX XX transferred XX the XXXXXXX or to XXX people XXXX benefit XXXX its XXXXXXXXX and work. XX XX XXX an ice cream, a part of XXX price XX XXX is XXXXX XXX XXX profit XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX retailer. X XXXXX XXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXX for XXXXXXX goods XXX services XX profit, in order XX XXXX a living. If XX attend to a XXXXXXXXX service, &XXXXX;XXX profit&XXXXX; XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX terms. The XXXXXX is XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX costs like any organization or XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. By keeping a XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX, XXXXX XXXXX are XXXX XX XXX as possible so more and more XXXXXX can XXXXXXX XXXX the XXXXXXX XXX XXX work XX the XXXXXXXXX entities. A strong argument XXX be XXXXXXXXX XXXX history. Religious organizations XXX XXXX XXX-XXXX or XXXXXX from most of them since ancient XXXXX. XXXXXXX, Egypt, Sumeria and other XXXXXXX XXX XXX XXX XXXXXXX or XXXXXXX. XXX American XXXXXXXXX for XXX exemption XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX from XXX British XXXXXX (Livingston, XXXX, XX X). XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX would be a XXXXX gain XXX XXX National XXXXXXXX but a huge XXXX for our society. XXXXX to XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXX wisdom XXXX XX XXXX. XX XXXX XXX, XX fulfill XX XXXXX a small part XX XXX XXXX XX our Lord. He did XXX build XXX XXXXX for making a XXXXXX XXX XXX XXX make wonders XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX. XX XXX XXXX XXX God with XXX XXXX XXX faith, not with XXX wallets.
Yes for non profit status
"No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or
he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and
Money.” – Matthew 6:24. One thing we can know for sure. The Internal Revenue Service
is serving money. Our XXXXXXX should serve XXX. XXX a XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX that wishes XX
XXXXX God, the XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX as XXX as XXXXXXXX. XX XXX XXX XXXXX XXX
sometimes suffer XXXX XXXXXXXXXX. Some XX us even XXXXX that money XXX XXX key for
happiness XXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Love, XXXX, and other moral XXXXXX are only philosophic
XXXXXXXX, XXXXX XXXX literature?
XX a XXXXXXXXX entity XXXXX XXXX to XXX taxes XXXX a profit-XXXXXXXX organization,
costs XXXXX XX transferred XX XXX members or XX the people XXXX XXXXXXX from XXX existence
and work. If we buy an XXX cream, a XXXX of the price XX pay is going XXX the profit XX XXX
manufacturer XXX the XXXXXXXX. X final XXXXXX XXX motivation for selling XXXXX XXX
services XX profit, in order to make a living. XX we XXXXXX XX a XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX, „XXX XXXXXX”
XXXXXX be XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX XXXXX. The church XX XXXX having XXXXXXX costs like any
organization or XXXXXXX households. By keeping a nonprofit status, these costs are kept as
XXX as possible so more XXX XXXX people XXX XXXXXXX from the XXXXXXX XXX the XXXX of
XXX XXXXXXXXX entities.
X strong argument XXX be XXXXXXXXX XXXX history. XXXXXXXXX organizations XXX
XXXX XXX-free or XXXXXX XXXX most of them XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX. Babilon, Egypt, Sumeria
XXX other empires did not XXX XXXXXXX or XXXXXXX. XXX American XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX
XXXXXXXXX for XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX is XXXXXXXX from the British XXXXXX (XXXXXXXXXX, XXXX, XX
X).
Taxing religious XXXXXXXX XXXXX be a small XXXX for the XXXXXXXX Treasury XXX a
XXXX XXXX XXX our XXXXXXX. Acces XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX and XXXXXX must XX free. In XXXX
way, we fulfill XX least a XXXXX XXXX of the work of our Lord. XX XXX XXX XXXXX the World
XXX making a profit and XXX XXX make XXXXXXX XXX entertainment. We XXX only XXX XXX
with XXX XXXX XXX XXXXX, not with our wallets.
Reference:
XXX XXXXXX
Livingston A. Elizabeth, XXXX, A XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX LEGAL
COMPROMISE: XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX RELIGIOUS
ENTITIES XXX NON-PROFITS, published in Rutgers XXXXXXX XX Law and Religion,
Spring 2008 XXXXXXX, XXXXXX X.1 , retrieved XX July X from
XXXX://XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXX/sites/XXXXXXXXXXXXXX.com/XXXXX/XXXXXXXXXX.pdf