Week 2 Discussion
XXXX it XXXXX to XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX are XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX ways XX determining if a test or assessment XX XXXXXXXXXX reliable, XXX XXXXXXXX way of XXXXXXXXXXX XX "XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX". It is XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XX know and XXXXXXXXXX something about XXXXXXXXXXX and the XXXXXXXX of XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX XXX XX XXXXXXX outcomes because XX these instruments are XXX XXXXXXXX XXX valid, XXXX XXX results XX XXX experiment XXXX always XX in doubt XXXX, XXXXX are XXXX XXXX are seen as reliable but XXX XXXXX, but there XXXXXX XX a XXXXX test without it first being XXXXXXXX, and tests can show XXXX they are still show their (reliability) XXX XXX show their (validity). XXXXX XXX different XXXXX XXXX are XXXX XX show XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX XXXXXXXX and valid-XXXX-Retest Reliability (Cohen &XXX; XXXXXXXX, XXXX).
When a researcher uses XXX XXXX exact measurements XXXX were used in the initial XXXX, XXXX repeatedly, XXXX if XXXX XXX the same XXXXX answer, if there has been XX change in XXXXXXXX he/she is measuring? XXXX XX the most plain and simplest XXXXXX XXX assessing XXXXXXXXXXX - when a XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX same XXXXXX XXX same question twice ("What's XXXX name?"), does he/she get XXXX the same results both times. XX so, XXX XXXXXXX XXX test-retest XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX piece XX XXXX XXXXXX about earlier has high test-XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX. XXX purpose XX reliability is to XXXXXXXXX the accuracy of the test and or its measurements. XX which XX XXX test are XXXXXXXXXX given so XXXX the reliability coefficient can XXXXXXXX XXX strength XX XXX XXXX XXXXXXX to help determine the relationships, errors XXXXXXXX, or XXXXXXXXX to XXXXXXX answers of how XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXX or XXXXXXX are. XXXXX is also a XXXXXXXX XXXX is an assessment of whether a measure appears, XX the face of it, to XXXXXXX the XXXXXXX it XX XXXXXXXX to XXXXXXX. Face validity XXXXXX XX XXX degree XX which an XXXXXXXXXX or XXXX subjectively XXXXXXX to XXXXXXX XXX variable or XXXXXXXXX that it is supposed XX XXXXXXX. XX XXXXX XXXXX, this validity XX XXXX an assessment or XXXX appears XX do XXXX it claims XX do. Similarly, aiding a stranger would meet the criterion of face validity for helping. XXXXXXX, asking XXXXXX XXXXX their XXXXXXXX XXXXX to XXXXXXX racial XXXXXXXXX has XXXXXX face XXXXXXXX (Salkind, 2017).
XXXXXXXXX:
XXXXX, X.J, &XXX;XXX; XXXXXXXX, X. (XXXX). Psychological Testing XXX Assessment (9th ed.). XXX XXXX, XX: XXXXXX-XXXX. XXXXXXXXX XXXX XXX University XX XXXXXXX eBook Collection database
Salkind, N. J. (2017). Statistics XXX people who (XXXXX they) hate statistics (6th ed.)
">