XXXXXXXX, I read a XXX XX XXXX XX the XXXXXXXX and a few years XXX, I XXXXXXXX a XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX chocolate XXXXX you smart. XX was from XXX XXX news and XXX XXXXX upon a XXXXX conducted XX Frank Messerli XX XXXXXXXX University. XX XXX study, he XXXX XXX number of Nobel Prize XXXXXXX in a XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX a general XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX compared it XXXX XXX nations chocolate consumption. XX XXXXXXXXX his results in the New XXXXXXX Journal of Medicine XXXXXXX a XXXXXXXXXXX with a P value of .XXXX.XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX he XXXXX XXXX Sweden XXX the highest XXXXXX of Nobel XXXXX XXXXXXX, XXX XXXX consumed much less XXXXXXXXX on average. In the end, XXXXXXXX had to XXXXXXXXXXX that just because he XXX able XX XXXXX correlation; it XXX XXX prove XXXXXXXXX (XXXXXXXXX, 2012).
A correlation is XXXXXX a recognized XXXXXXXXXXXX between two things or events, but it XXXX XXX imply XXXXXXXXX. Causation at XXX simplest definition XXXXXX to XXXXXXXXXXX the XXXXX or reason XXX XXXX XXXX XX phenomenon. However, correlation, XXXXXXX with a XXXXXXXXXX causal XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX constitute strong evidence that there may XX XXXXXXXXX. XX someone wants to XXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX causation in XXXXXXXXXX, it must be XXXX through XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXX
Pritchard, C. (XXXX, November XX). Does XXXXXXXXX make you XXXXXX? XXXXXXXXX XXXX http://XXX.bbc.com/XXXX/magazine-XXXXXXXX