Criminal activity is the way to react for most tribes during the ethnical conflicts between them. Beyond this form of assault and intimidation between neighbors, politicians funded the election campaigns from money earned from this criminal activity. In the last 20 years the raids evolved from old methods to a modern approach. Some bands use modern military equipment. Most of the money earned from selling the stolen veil is spent on new military equipment. The firearms are used also in raids upon villages lived by other ethnic groups than the attackers. The struggle is getting moXX XXXXXXX as pastoral XXXXXXXXXX XXX more XXXXXXXXX. We XXXX about the privatization process for agricultural activities, new XXXXXXXX conservation XXXXX XXX XXXXX population XXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX try XXXXXXXXXXXX to redraw XXX inside boundaries between regions. XX this way XXXX XXXXXXX XX isolate XXXXXX groups XXXXXXX XXXX in order XX prevent XXX XXXXXXXXX. Areas XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXX fertile XXXX are XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX in Kenya. Farming and related XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX the XXXX XXXXXXX of XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXX XXXXX row leaders come from XXXXXXX or criminal organizations XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX.
Greiner is focused on a XXXXXX case to demonstrate in a XXXXXXXX way the XXXX between multiple factors that XXXXXX XXX XXXXXXX situation. His point of XXXX is that a XXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXX situation XXXXXX be XXXX alone in the context. Every cause and XXXXXX are XXXXXX XXXXXXX. The XXXXXX tend to cause other XXXXXXX in other plans. XXXX in XXX XXXX, a XXXXXXXX activity is a source of funding for XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX are a source XX ethnical conflict for public XXXXXXXX. Ethnical XXXXXXXXX put a pressure XX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXX. Lack XX XXXXXXXXXXX brings XXXXXXX and XXXXXXX tends XXXX to criminal activities.
Greiner XXXX for intrinsic XXXXXXX as XXX XXXX is XXXX-XXXXXXXX. XX reveals an XXXXXX situation XXXX XX XXX complex to apply in other XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX or countries. The particularities XXX XXXXXX. In the XXXX XXXXXXXX by Greiner, XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX not have XXXX so efficient. Every ethnic XXXXX XXX XXX own particularities. Understanding XXXXX particularities help understand XXX conflict XXXX XXX roots. XX XXXXXXX to find locals bringing their opinion about XXX subject. XX find out this way XXXX we XXXX a de-XXXXX federal XXXXX XXXX a weak government. The weakness XXXXX from the vicious XXXXXX demonstrated XX Greiner. XXXXXXXXXX XX a XXXXXXX XXXXXX of income and welfare XXX politicians XXXX XXXXXXXX growth. Economic growth XXX XXX XXXXXX because of XXX XXXXXXXXXX. Agriculture XX the XXXX of XXXXX XXXXXXX. If the XXXXXXXXXXX is XXXXXXXX by criminal activities XXXX scares XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXXX. All these details could not have been concluded XX Greiner XXXX a XXXXXXXXXX between XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. In his XXXX XXX details are XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXXX&XXXXX;s article XX making a XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX between XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX in XXX XXX they XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX during the last 50 years. XXX main objective of his XXXXXXX is XX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX motivations XXX XXXXXXXXX states to XXXXXX national laws with XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. XXXX comparative XXXXXXXX we can XXXX out how XXX selected countries XXXXXXX to apply or avoided changes in XXXXX XXXXXXXX laws. XX XXXXXXXXX back then and also today, XXXXX XXXXX found guilty for XXXXXXXX human XXXXXX is XXXXX to make three XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX. The XXXXX is XX XXXXXXX financial XXXXXXXXXXX XX the victims, the second XX to make symbolic gestures that XXXXX the victim and recognize XXXXX XXXXXXXX for XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX. The XXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX such XX XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX the fault XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX assure that national XXXX XXXXX not XXXXXX a XXXXXXX conflict in XXX future.
XXX compared analyses XXXX a XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX of how states have evolved during a period XX time in the XXXXX rights matter. We XXXX out XXXX Argentina XXXX an XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX dictatorship to democracy. It XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX code XX XXXX XXXXXXXXX to military personnel and made XXXXX XXXXXXX for compliance with XXXXX rights. XXXXXXX were XXXX especially XXXXX the economic crisis XX the XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX. Great XXXXX partners of XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX in treaties the human XXXXXX XXXXX in order XX continue business. XXXXXXXX had a XXXXX resistance XX change XXX it also managed XX XXXXX XXXX XX enforce XXXXX XXXXXX. Military XXXXXXXXX is XXXXX high XXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXXX a XXX XX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXX conflicts. Even if XXX XXXXXXX Court had a XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXX, XXX Government XXX Legislature had a lot of XXXXXXX XXXXXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX in keeping XXX old XXX of XXXXXX. XXXXXX is the last XXXXXXX and XX XXXX about a country that did not comply yet with the XXXXX rights XXXX. XXXXXXXXXXXX are XXXX XXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX.
The author considers XXXX in XXX XXX XXXXXXXX, the XXXX motivation for XXXXXX were the political will and possible XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX XXXXXX, especially in XXXXX. XX uses these three XXXXX in order to XXXX similarities between XXXX. Despite XXX XXXXXXXXXX in XXX internal XXXXXXXX of the XXXXX, XXX XXXX decisional factors are the same. The XXXX XXXXXXX the military force and XXXXXXXXXX XX common in XXX XXXXX examples as they XXXX XXXX XXXXX countries compliance to XXXXX rights law.
Finding similarities helped XXXX the XXX XXXXXXX. XX XXXXXXX XXX method of XXXXXXXXXXXXX so we XXX use XXX XXXXXXXXXXX in other XXXXXX from XXXXX continents. That XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX’s XXXXXXXX XX in instrumental XXXXXXX. XX is more XXXXXXXXX in the matter globally XXXX for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXXXXXXX he found XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX or XXXX a XXXXX XXXXX XXX XX available in XXX XXX countries when it XXXXX to XXXXXX with XXXXXXXXXXXXX laws. The XXXXXXXXXX is XXXX XX the XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX grade or XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXX that XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXXX XXXX tend more to XXXXXX with the international XXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX; even if the XXX rules are not XXXX to XXXXX in XXXXX circumstance XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX conflicts or XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX!
XXXX conclusion XXX more XXXX XX XXXX with the help XX country comparisons. The XXXX he studied XXXXXXX with a similarity, continued XXXX XXXXXXXXXX evolution XXX ended with a global XXXXXXXXXX. XX XXXXX XXXXX countries XXXXXXX in theory XXX XXXXXX speech XX XXXXXXXXX human XXXXXX in national law packs. XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX the internal resistance XXX change in XXXX XXXXXXX. XXXX XX the XXXXXXXXX had XXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX in XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX convention they signed, they did not XXXXXXX each others promise in a full XXX. XXXXXXX XX internal XXXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXXXX XXXX was the same: the XXXXXXXXXX for XXXXXX XXX the XXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXX.
XXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXX on a XXXXXX case would have not XXXXXX XXX in XXXXXX a point. Human Rights are an international XXXXXXX XXX they must XX XXXXXXX XXXX XXX. XXX XXXXXX XXXX comply with XXXXX universal rules. XXX states respecting this rules XXXX diplomatically XXXXX XXX non-XXXXXXXXX ones to XXXX progress and reach the XXXX XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX.
In the article written by Greiner we find out about a complex link between cattle raiding, ethnical conflicts and political involvement. The author brings us detailed information about the current situation and the historical background about this fact. According to this article, we can say that cattle raiding has been a criminal activity before the foundation of now days Kenya. Such actions have been emerging since the colonial times. Political interventions modified only their intensity and modus operandi.
Criminal activity is the way to react for most tribes during the ethnical conflicts between them. Beyond this form of assault and intimidation between neighbors, politicians funded the election campaigns from money earned from this criminal activity. In the last 20 years the raids evolved from old methods to a modern approach. Some bands use modern military equipment. Most of the money earned from selling the stolen veil is spent on new military equipment. The firearms are used also in raids upon villages lived by other ethnic groups than the attackers. The stXXXXXX is XXXXXXX more XXXXXXX as pastoral XXXXXXXXXX XXX more difficult. We find XXXXX the privatization XXXXXXX for agricultural XXXXXXXXXX, new wildlife conservation areas XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX XXX periodically to redraw the XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX between XXXXXXX. XX this XXX they attempt to XXXXXXX ethnic groups between XXXX in order XX XXXXXXX XXX conflicts. Areas XXXX XXXXX water XXX XXXXXXX soil are XXX vey XXXXXXXXXX in Kenya. Farming XXX related XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX are XXX main XXXXXXs XX money XXX politicians. Even XXXXX row XXXXXXX come XXXX farmers or criminal organizations XXXXXXX XXXXXXX them.
Greiner is XXXXXXX on a single case to demonstrate in a XXXXXXXX way the link between XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX that caused XXX current XXXXXXXXX. His XXXXX XX view is XXXX a negative or positive situation XXXXXX XX XXXX XXXXX in the cXXXXXX. Every XXXXX and XXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX. XXX XXXXXX tend to cause other XXXXXXX in other XXXXX. Like in XXX case, a XXXXXXXX activity is a XXXXXX XX XXXXXXX for XXXXXXXXXXX. Politicians XXX a source XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX sympathy. Ethnical conflicts XXX a pressure on state XXXXXXXXXXXX and development. Lack of XXXXXXXXXXX brings XXXXXXX XXX poverty tends back XX criminal activities.
XXXXXXX aims for XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX as his case is self-standing. XX XXXXXXX an actual XXXXXXXXX that is XXX complex to apply in other fields of research or countries. The XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX are XXXXXX. In XXX XXXX analyzed XX XXXXXXX, comparison XXXXX not XXXX been so XXXXXXXXX. Every ethnic group XXX its own particularities. XXXXXXXXXXXXX these particularities help understand XXX XXXXXXXX from XXX roots. XX XXXXXXX XX find XXXXXX bringing their opinion about XXX subject. We find out this XXX XXXX XX XXXX a de-XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX a XXXX government. XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX from the vicious circle XXXXXXXXXXXX by XXXXXXX. Corruption XX a XXXXXXX source XX income and XXXXXXX for politicians than XXXXXXXX XXXXXX. Economic XXXXXX can not XXXXXX because XX the corruption. XXXXXXXXXXX is XXX base of every XXXXXXX. XX the agriculture is affected XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX this XXXXXX eventual investors or developers. All these details could XXX XXXX been concluded XX XXXXXXX XXXX a comparison between XXXXXXX situations. XX his case the details are XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX.
Hillebrecht’s XXXXXXX XX making a XXXXXXXX analysis XXXXXXX Brazil, XXXXXXina XXX Columbia in the XXX they XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX Rights PXXXXX XXXXXX XXX XXXX 50 XXXXX. The main XXXXXXXXX XX his XXXXXXX XX XX prove the XXXXXXXXX motivations XXX different XXXXXX XX comply national laws with Human XXXXXX Convention. With comparative examples XX XXX find out how XXX XXXXXXXX countries XXXXXXX XX XXXXX or avoided changes in their XXXXXXXX XXXX. XX principle XXXX then and also today, eXXXX state XXXXX guilty for XXXXXXXX human rights XX XXXXX XX make XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX efforts. XXX first is XX provide XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX the XXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXX is to XXXX symbolic XXXXXXXX that XXXXX the XXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXX pledging for XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX. XXX XXXX two measures focus XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX such as XXXXXXXXX the reXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXX measures XX XXXXXX XXXX national XXXX XXXXX not XXXXXX a similar conflict in XXX XXXXXX.
The compared XXXXXXXX XXXX a XXXXXXXXXXXXX view of how states have evolved during a period of time in XXX human rights XXXXXX. XX find out that Argentina XXXX an important XXXXXXXXXX from military XXXXXXXXXXXX XX democracy. It XXXXXXXXX the separate XXXX of laws XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX personnel and made XXXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX with human XXXXXX. XXXXXXX XXXX XXXX especially after XXX economic crisis at XXX beginning of XXXX"s. XXXXt trade partners of XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX in treaties XXX human XXXXXX XXXXX in order XX continue business. Columbia XXX a great XXXXXXXXXX to change XXX it also managed to adopt laws XX enforce human XXXXXX. Military XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX high and XXX process XXXXX a lot of hesitation and rebel conflicts. XXXX XX XXX XXXXXXX Court XXX a more independent XXX, XXX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXXX had a XXX XX corrupt XXXXXXX. XXXX XXXX interested in XXXXXXX the XXX way XX XXXXXX. Brazil XX XXX XXXX example and XX XXXX about a XXXXXXX XXXX did XXX XXXXXX XXX XXXX XXX XXXXX rights XXXX. XXXXXXXXXXXX are high XXX XXX new XXXXXXXXX XXXXX.
The author XXXXXXXXX that in XXX XXX XXXXXXXX, XXX main motivation for XXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX and XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX in external XXXXXX, especially in XXXXX. XX uses these three cases in order to seek XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX them. Despite XXX difference in XXX internal handling XX the issue, XXX main decisional factors are XXX XXXX. XXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX is XXXXXX in all XXXXX XXXXXXXX as they XXXX XXXX their XXXXXXXXX compliance to XXXXX XXXXXX law.
Finding similarities helped XXXX XXX big XXXXXXX. He XXXXXXX XXX method of XXXXXXXXXXXXX so XX XXX use our XXXXXXXXXXX in other states from XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. That XX XXX Hillebrecht’s XXXXXXXX XX in instrumental purpose. He is XXXX concerned in XXX matter XXXXXXXX XXXX XXX particularities. The XXXXXXXXX he found XXXXXXXXXXg XXXXX or XXXX a heavy XXXXX can XX XXXXXXXXX in all XXX countries XXXX it comes XX XXXXXX XXXX international laws. XXX XXXXXXXXXX is made by the XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX grade or XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXX that seek international recognition or XXXXXXXXXX will tend XXXX to XXXXXX XXXX the XXXXXXXXXXXXX conventions XXXX sign; eXXX if XXX new XXXXX are not easy XX apply in every circumstance because XX XXXXXXXX cXXXXXXXX or political opinions!
XXXX conclusion was more XXXX XX XXXX XXXX the XXXX of country comparisons. The XXXX he studied XXXXXXX XXXX a similarity, continued with XXXXXXXXXX evolution XXX XXXXX with a XXXXXX conclusion. He found three XXXXXXXXX willing in XXXXXX and public XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX in national XXX XXXXX. XXX author followed the internal resistance for XXXXXX in this process. XXXX if the XXXXXXXXX had set XXXXXXXX some XXXXX in the InterAmerican convention they signed, they did not XXXXXXX each other"s XXXXXXX in a XXXX way. XXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX problems, the external XXXX XXX XXX XXXX: the XXXXXXXXXX XXX change XXX XXX lack XX political XXXX.
XXXX XX why focusing on a XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXX helped him in XXXXXX a XXXXX. Human Rights XXX an international XXXXXXX XXX they must XX XXXXXXX this way. XXX states XXXX XXXXXX XXXX these universal rules. All states XXXXXXXXXX this rules must XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX the non-XXXXXXXXX ones XX XXXX progress XXX reach XXX same approach and objective.