Criminal activity is the way to react for most tribes during the ethnical conflicts between them. Beyond this form of assault and intimidation between neighbors, politicians funded the election campaigns from money earned from this criminal activity. In the last 20 years the raids evolved from old methods to a modern approach. Some bands use modern military equipment. Most of the money earned from selling the stolen veil is spent on new military equipment. The firearms are used also in raids upon villages lived by other ethnic groups than the attackers. The struggle is getting moXX complex as pastoral activities are XXXX XXXXXXXXX. We XXXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX for XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX, XXX wildlife XXXXXXXXXXXX areas XXX rapid XXXXXXXXXX growth. XXXXXXXXXXX XXX periodically XX XXXXXX XXX inside boundaries XXXXXXX XXXXXXX. In this way XXXX attempt to isolate XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX in order to XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX. XXXXX with XXXXX XXXXX and fertile XXXX are XXX vey XXXXXXXXXX in Kenya. Farming and related criminal XXXXXXXX XXX XXX main sources XX money for XXXXXXXXXXX. Even XXXXX row XXXXXXX XXXX from XXXXXXX or criminal organizations related between them.
Greiner is XXXXXXX XX a single XXXX to XXXXXXXXXXX in a XXXXXXXX way XXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX that XXXXXX the current situation. His point of view is that a XXXXXXXX or positive situation XXXXXX be left XXXXX in the XXXXXXX. Every cause and effect are linked between. XXX XXXXXX XXXX to XXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX in XXXXX plans. XXXX in his XXXX, a criminal XXXXXXXX is a XXXXXX of funding XXX XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX are a XXXXXX XX ethnical conflict for public XXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXX conflicts put a XXXXXXXX on XXXXX organization and XXXXXXXXXXX. XXXX of development brings poverty and poverty tends XXXX XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX.
Greiner XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX as XXX case XX self-XXXXXXXX. XX XXXXXXX an actual situation that XX XXX XXXXXXX to apply in XXXXX XXXXXX of research or XXXXXXXXX. The particularities are unique. In the XXXX XXXXXXXX by XXXXXXX, comparison would not have been so XXXXXXXXX. Every XXXXXX XXXXX has XXX own particularities. Understanding these particularities help understand the conflict from its XXXXX. He manages to XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX about the subject. XX XXXX out this XXX that XX XXXX a de-XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX a XXXX government. The weakness comes XXXX the XXXXXXX circle XXXXXXXXXXXX by XXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX XX a XXXXXXX source XX XXXXXX XXX welfare XXX politicians than XXXXXXXX growth. Economic XXXXXX XXX XXX emerge XXXXXXX XX XXX corruption. XXXXXXXXXXX is XXX base XX every country. If XXX agriculture is affected XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX this scares XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXXX. All XXXXX details could XXX XXXX XXXX concluded if Greiner XXXX a XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX similar XXXXXXXXXX. XX his case XXX details XXX bringing XXX conclusion.
Hillebrecht&XXXXX;s article is XXXXXX a compared XXXXXXXX between XXXXXX, Argentina and Columbia in XXX way XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX Rights Policy during XXX last XX XXXXX. XXX main XXXXXXXXX of his article is to XXXXX the XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX for different states XX XXXXXX national XXXX with XXXXX Rights XXXXXXXXXX. With XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX can find out how the selected countries managed to XXXXX or avoided XXXXXXX in XXXXX national laws. In principle XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXXX, every XXXXX XXXXX guilty XXX breaking human XXXXXX XX asked XX make three reparation XXXXXXX. XXX first is XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX reparations to XXX victims, XXX second is XX XXXX symbolic XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXX victim and recognize XXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX public XXXXXXXXX. The XXXX XXX measures focus XX juridical effects such as punishing the XXXXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX and XXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX assure that national laws XXXXX XXX XXXXXX a similar XXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXX.
The XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX take a chronological view XX how states XXXX evolved during a period of time in the XXXXX rights matter. We find out that Argentina XXXX an important XXXXXXXXXX from military dictatorship to XXXXXXXXX. XX abolished the separate XXXX XX laws XXXXXXXXX XX military personnel and made great XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXX with human XXXXXX. XXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX after XXX economic crisis at the beginning XX XXXXX. Great XXXXX partners XX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX the human XXXXXX issue in order XX XXXXXXXX business. Columbia had a XXXXX resistance XX XXXXXX XXX it also managed XX adopt XXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXXX rights. Military XXXXXXXXX XX still high and the process meant a XXX of hesitation XXX XXXXX conflicts. Even XX the Supreme XXXXX XXX a more XXXXXXXXXXX act, the Government and Legislature XXX a lot XX corrupt members. XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX in keeping the XXX XXX XX acting. Brazil XX XXX last example and XX find XXXXX a XXXXXXX that did XXX comply yet XXXX XXX human XXXXXX XXXX. Expectations are high for the new XXXXXXXXX XXXXX.
XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXX in all his examples, the main motivation XXX change XXXX the political XXXX XXX possible XXXXXXXXXX in external XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXX. He uses these three cases in order XX XXXX similarities XXXXXXX them. Despite the XXXXXXXXXX in XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX the XXXXX, the main XXXXXXXXXX factors are XXX same. XXX XXXX XXXXXXX the XXXXXXXX XXXXX and corruption XX common in all three examples XX they hold back their XXXXXXXXX compliance to XXXXX XXXXXX law.
Finding XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX draw the big picture. He applied XXX method of XXXXXXXXXXXXX so XX XXX XXX our conclusions in other states from other XXXXXXXXXX. XXXX is why Hillebrecht’s XXXXXXXX is in instrumental XXXXXXX. XX XX XXXX concerned in the matter globally XXXX for particularities. XXX XXXXXXXXX he XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX badly or XXXX a XXXXX start can XX XXXXXXXXX in all the countries XXXX it XXXXX XX XXXXXX with international XXXX. The difference is made XX the democratization grade or XXXXXXXXXX preoccupation. Countries XXXX seek XXXXXXXXXXXXX recognition or XXXXXXXXXX will XXXX more XX XXXXXX XXXX the XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX they XXXX; XXXX if XXX new rules XXX not XXXX XX apply in XXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX or XXXXXXXXX opinions!
XXXX conclusion XXX more easy XX XXXX with XXX help of XXXXXXX comparisons. The XXXX he XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX a XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX with particular XXXXXXXXX XXX ended XXXX a global XXXXXXXXXX. XX found three XXXXXXXXX willing in theory XXX public XXXXXX to implement XXXXX rights in national law XXXXX. The author XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX in this process. Even XX XXX XXXXXXXXX had XXX XXXXXXXX XXXX rules in the XXXXXXXXXXXXX convention they XXXXXX, they XXX not respect XXXX others promise in a full XXX. XXXXXXX of XXXXXXXX problems, XXX external view was XXX same: XXX resistance for change and XXX lack XX political will.
XXXX XX why focusing on a XXXXXX case would have XXX XXXXXX him in making a point. Human XXXXXX are an XXXXXXXXXXXXX concern and they XXXX XX treated XXXX way. XXX XXXXXX must XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXX. XXX states respecting XXXX XXXXX must XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX XXX XXX-complying ones XX make progress and XXXXX the XXXX XXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX.
In the article written by Greiner we find out about a complex link between cattle raiding, ethnical conflicts and political involvement. The author brings us detailed information about the current situation and the historical background about this fact. According to this article, we can say that cattle raiding has been a criminal activity before the foundation of now days Kenya. Such actions have been emerging since the colonial times. Political interventions modified only their intensity and modus operandi.
Criminal activity is the way to react for most tribes during the ethnical conflicts between them. Beyond this form of assault and intimidation between neighbors, politicians funded the election campaigns from money earned from this criminal activity. In the last 20 years the raids evolved from old methods to a modern approach. Some bands use modern military equipment. Most of the money earned from selling the stolen veil is spent on new military equipment. The firearms are used also in raids upon villages lived by other ethnic groups than the attackers. The struggle is getting XXXX XXXXXXX as XXXXXXXX activities XXX more XXXXXXXXX. We find about XXX privatization XXXXXXX XXX agricultural XXXXXXXXXX, new XXXXXXXX conservation areas and rapid XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXX try XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX the XXXXXX boundaries between XXXXXXX. In XXXX way they XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX ethnic XXXXXX between them in order to XXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX. XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX and XXXXXXX soil are XXX vey XXXXXXXXXX in Kenya. Farming XXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX the XXXX XXXXXXs of money for politicians. XXXX XXXXX row leaders XXXX XXXX farmers or XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX related XXXXXXX them.
XXXXXXX is focused on a XXXXXX case to demonstrate in a detailed way the XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX caused the XXXXXXX situation. His XXXXX XX view XX XXXX a negative or positive situation cannot be left alone in the cXXXXXX. Every XXXXX and XXXXXX XXX linked between. The XXXXXX tend XX cause other effects in XXXXX XXXXX. Like in his case, a XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX a source XX XXXXXXX XXX politicians. Politicians are a XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX conflict for public sympathy. Ethnical conflicts XXX a pressure on XXXXX organization and development. XXXX of XXXXXXXXXXX brings poverty XXX XXXXXXX tends XXXX to XXXXXXXX activities.
XXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX purpose as his XXXX is XXXX-XXXXXXXX. XX reveals an XXXXXX situation XXXX XX too XXXXXXX to XXXXX in XXXXX fields XX research or countries. The XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX are unique. In the case analyzed by Greiner, XXXXXXXXXX would XXX have been so efficient. Every XXXXXX XXXXX XXX its own paXXXXXXXXXXXXX. Understanding these XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX conflict from its roots. XX XXXXXXX XX XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX their XXXXXXX XXXXX the subject. XX XXXX out this way XXXX XX XXXX a de-XXXXX federal state with a weak government. The XXXXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXX circle demonstrated XX XXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX is a greater source of income and XXXXXXX for politicians XXXX economic XXXXXX. XXXXXXXX growth can not emerge because of XXX corruption. XXXXXXXXXXX is XXX base XX XXXXX country. If XXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX affected by criminal XXXXXXXXXX this XXXXXX XXXXXXXX investors or developers. All XXXse details XXXXX XXX have XXXX concluded XX Greiner made a XXXXXXXXXX between similar situations. XX his XXXX the XXXXXXX are XXXXXXXX the XXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXXXXXX’s XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX a XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX, XXXXXXina and XXXXXXia in the XXX they implemented Human Rights XXXXXX during the XXXX 50 XXXXX. XXX XXXX objective XX XXX XXXXXXX is XX XXXXX the strongest XXXXXXXXXXX for XXXXXXXXX states to XXXXXX national laws with Human XXXXXX Convention. With comparative examples we XXX XXXX out how XXX selected countries XXXXXXX XX XXXXX or XXXXXed changes in their XXXXXXXX laws. In principle XXXX XXXX XXX XXXX today, every state found guiXXX XXX breaking XXXXX rights is XXXXX to XXXX XXXXX reparation XXXXXXX. XXX XXXXX is XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXXX, the second XX to XXXX symbolic XXXXXXXX that XXXXX XXX victim and recognize guilt pledging XXX XXXXXX apologize. XXX last two XXXXXXXX XXXXX XX juridical XXXXXXX such XX XXXXXXXXX the XXsponsible XXX the XXXXX XXX taking measures to assure XXXX XXXXXXXX laws XXXXX XXX permit a similar conflict in XXX XXXXXX.
XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX a XXXXXXXXXXXXX view of how states XXve XXXXXXX during a period of time in the human rights XXXXXX. XX XXXX out that XXXXXXXXX made an important XXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX dictatorship XX XXXXXXXXX. It abolished the XXXXXXXX code of laws dedicated XX XXXXXXXX personnel and XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX XXX compliance with human rights. Efforts XXXX XXXX especially XXXXX the XXXXXXXX crisis at the beginning XX XXXX"s. XXXXt XXXXX XXXXXXXX XX Argentina XXXXXXX in XXXXXXXX the XXXXX rights issue in order XX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX. Columbia XXX a XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX to XXXXXX but it also XXXXXXX XX XXXXX XXXX XX XXXXXXX human rights. Military influence is still XXXX XXX XXX process XXXXX a XXX XX hesitation XXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXX. Even XX the Supreme XXXXX XXX a XXXX independent XXX, the XXXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX had a XXX XX XXXXXXX members. They were interested in keeping the XXX XXX XX acting. XXXXXX XX the XXXX XXXXXXX XXX XX find about a XXXXXXX XXXX XXX XXX XXXXXX yet with the human rights XXXX. XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX high XXX the new XXXXXXXXX XXXXX.
The author considers XXXX in all his XXXXXXXX, XXX XXXX motivation for XXXXXX XXXX XXX political XXXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX in external XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX in trade. XX XXXX these three XXXXX in order to seek XXXXXXXXXXXX between them. Despite XXX difference in XXX internal handling of XXX XXXXX, XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX factors are the XXXX. XXX link between XXX XXXXXXXX force XXX XXXXXXXXXX XX common in XXX three XXXXXXXX as they XXXX XXXX their XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX XXXXXX XXX.
XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX helped draw XXX XXg picture. XX XXXXXXX the method XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX so XX can use XXX conclusions in other states XXXX other continents. That is XXX Hillebrecht’s approach is in XXXXXXXXXXXX purpose. He XX more concerned in the XXXXXX XXXXXXXX than XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. The mechanism he found XXXXXXXXXXg XXXXX or XXXX a XXXXX start can be XXXXXXXXX in XXX XXX countries when it comes XX comply with XXXXXXXXional laws. The difference XX XXXX XX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX grade or commercial XXXXXXXXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXX that XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX recognition or reputation will tend more to XXXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX they sign; eXXX if XXX new rules XXX XXX easy XX XXXXX in XXXXX circumstance XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXXX conflicts or XXXXXXXXX opinions!
This conclusion was more easy XX make XXXX XXX help XX country comparisons. XXX XXXX he XXXXXXX XXXXXXX with a XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX with XXXXXXXXXX evolution XXX ended with a XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX. He XXXXX three countries XXXXXXX in theory and XXXXXX XXXXXX XX implement human XXXXXX in XXXXXXXX law packs. The XXXXXX followed the XXXXXXXX resistance for XXXXXX in XXXX process. Even XX the XXXXXXXXX XXX XXX XXXXXXXX XXXX rules in the InterAmerican XXXXXXXXXX they XXXXXX, they did not XXXXXXX each XXXXX"s promise in a full XXX. XXXXXXX of internal XXXXXXXX, the external view was XXX XXXX: the XXXXXXXXXX for change and XXX lack XX XXXXXXXXX will.
XXXX XX why XXXXXXXX XX a single case would XXXX not XXXXXX him in XXXXXX a XXXXX. Human XXXXXX are an international concern XXX XXXX XXXX XX treated XXXX way. All XXXXXX must XXXXXX XXXX these universal XXXXX. XXX XXXXXX respecting XXXX rules must XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX the non-complying XXXX to make progress and XXXXX XXX XXXX approach and objective.