Part 1:
On the basis of given information we can come across the following conclusions:
P: Celtic fans hate the Lakers.
P: Nancy loves the Celtics.
C: XXXXX hates the Lakers.
P: All the XXXXXXX XX XXX track XXXX shaved their heads
X: Mike is XX XXX track XXXX.
X: XXXX shaved XXX head.
P: If it didn’t XXXX XXXXX, I’d have to XXXXX XX XXXXX.
X: I XXXX’t have XX water my roses.
C: XX rained XXXXX.
P: I can take XXXXXXXX, Speedway, or 22XX to get to XXXX.
P: XXXX and XXXXXXXX are XXXXXX XXX construction.
C: I XXX only XXXX XXXXX XXX.
X: XX Karen publishes X articles she can XXXX her job.
X: XXXXX published X XXXXXXXX.
X: XXXXX will loose her job .
Part 2:
XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXX arguments XX XXXX own, XXXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXX and conclusions. Please make XXX XXXX XXXXX and the XXXXXXXXXX sound. You can XXXXXX them XX classic syllogisms, or you XXX use a chain XXXXXXXX or another XXXX of XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XX you prefer.
X.
XXXXXXX 1 - XXX railroad drivers XXXX pass a XXXXXX test every XXXX.
XXXXXXX 2 - XXXXX XX a XXXXXXX XXXXXX.
Conclusion - Marsh XXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XXXX XXXXX year.
X.
XXXXXXX X -XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX apply XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXX.
XXXXXXX 2 - Greg applied XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX - XXXX must XX an engineering student.
X.
XXXXXXX 1- It is XXXXXXXXX for every XXXXXXXXXXXX XX have an entry permit XX XXXX XXXXXX reserve.
Premise X - XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX reserve XXXX XXXX
Conclusion - She XXXX have XXX an XXXXX XXXXXX.
X.
XXXXXXX X - None of the passengers of XXX XXX fated XXX escaped unhurt
XXXXXXX 2 - Pristina XXX XXXXXXXXX XX that bus.
XXXXXXXXXX - XXXXXXXX XXX one XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX suffered injuries.
">